Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 125 / Act 230 of 1972
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.1518 (2026)

Filing claim of appeal or petition to review.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

STILLE-DEROSSETT-HALE SINGLE STATE CONSTRUCTION CODE ACT


Act 230 of 1972


125.1518 Filing claim of appeal or petition to review.

Sec. 18.

    An appeal pursuant to Act No. 306 of the Public Acts of 1969, as amended, from a decision of the commission or a board, following an appeal from a decision of a board of appeals or enforcing agency shall be made by a claim of appeal filed with the court of appeals. An appeal pursuant to that act from any other decision of the commission or of a board shall be by petition to review filed with the Ingham county circuit court.

History: 1972, Act 230, Eff. Jan. 1, 1973

Compiler's Notes:

    For provisions of Act 306 of 1969, referred to in this section, see MCL 24.201 et seq.

PopularName Notes:

Act 230

PopularName Notes:

Uniform Construction Code
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case: Cummins v. Robinson Twp., 770 N.W.2d 421 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cummins v. Robinson Twp., 770 N.W.2d 421 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “1517; MCL 125.1518; MCL 24.301. Consequently, plaintiffs cannot establish reasonable reliance on any incorrect building code decision defendants made that would constitute a viable claim for fraud.”
Ypsilanti Twp. v. Edward Rose Bldg. Co., 315 N.W.2d 196 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “MCL 125.1518; MSA 5.2949(18). In the instant case, plaintiff did not appeal the commission’s decision but, rather, renewed its petition for injunctive relief in the circuit court.”
Royal Oak Twp. Investments, LLC, et al. v. Royal Oak Twp., et al. (E.D. Mich. 2026). · cites it 2× “” Section 125.1518 states that an “appeal [] from a decision of the commission or a board, [] shall be made by a claim of appeal filed with the court of appeals.”
Phil Forner v. Allendale Charter Twp. (Mich. Ct. App. 2020). “Appellant is a licensed mechanical contractor who performed permitted work on a single- family residence within Allendale Charter Township.”
Phil Forner v. Tallmadge Charter Twp. (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “This case involves appellant’s appeal of the Michigan Construction Code Commission’s final decision, which approved in part and denied in part his application for appeal, which challenged the local code inspector’s nonapproval of a furnace installation completed by Forner.”
20241218_C369584_38_369584.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “In turn, MCL 125.1518 provides in relevant part that “[a]n appeal pursuant to Act No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.