Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 141.625 (2026)

Partial business activity in city; substitute methods.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

CITY INCOME TAX ACT


Act 284 of 1964


141.625 Partial business activity in city; substitute methods.

Sec. 25.

    An alternative method of accounting shall be used if the taxpayer or the administrator demonstrates that the net profits of the taxpayer allocable to the city cannot be justly and equitably determined under the separate accounting method or the business allocation percentage method, or if undue expense to the taxpayer would result from complying therewith because of the taxpayer's manner of operations and methods of accounting. In such case the administrator, upon application of the taxpayer or upon his own initiative, may approve or specify factors or methods of determination as will effect a just, nondiscriminatory and reasonable result. Application to the administrator to substitute other factors in the formula or to use a different method to allocate net profits shall be made in writing and state the specific grounds on which the substitution of factors or use of a different method is requested and the relief sought. No specific form need be followed in making the application. Once a taxpayer has filed under a substitute method, he shall continue so to file until given permission by the administrator to change.

History: 1964, Act 284, Imd. Eff. June 12, 1964

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1971–2024 · leading case: Borman's, Inc. v. City of Detroit, 191 N.W.2d 367 (Mich. 1971).
Borman's, Inc. v. City of Detroit, 191 N.W.2d 367 (Mich. 1971). · cites it 2× “” MCLA § 141.625 (Stat Ann 1969 Rev § 5.3194[35]) provides that: “An alternative method of accounting shall be used if the taxpayer or the administrator demonstrates that the net profits of the taxpayer allocable to the city cannot be justly and equitably determined under the…”
Apex Labs. Int'l Inc v. City of Detroit (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 8× “] Further, [w]hen the entire net profit of a business subject to the tax is not derived from business activities exclusively within the city, the portion of the entire net profit, earned as a result of work done, services rendered or other business activity conducted in the…”
Honigman Miller Schwartz & Cohn LLP v. City of Detroit, 952 N.W.2d 358 (Mich. 2020). · cites it 2× “624], or [MCL 141.625]. [MCL 141.618.] There is no dispute that Honigman’s city taxes are determined under MCL 141.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.