Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 15.6 (2026)

Repeal.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

BONDS OF STATE OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES


Act 10 of 1969


15.6 Repeal.

Sec. 6.

     Act No. 20 of the Public Acts of 1968, being section 15.111 of the Compiled Laws of 1948, is repealed.

History: 1969, Act 10, Imd. Eff. May 7, 1969

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1966–2026 · leading case: State Bar Grievance Adm'r v. Jackson, 211 N.W.2d 38 (Mich. 1973).
State Bar Grievance Adm'r v. Jackson, 211 N.W.2d 38 (Mich. 1973). · cites it 2× “That this constituted a violation of Section 15.6 of the Grievance Board Rules.”
Shulhan v. Hamtramck City Council, 146 N.W.2d 717 (Mich. Ct. App. 1966). · cites it 2× “2 Section 15.6 of the zoning ordinance provides: “The decision of sneh board shall not become final until the expiration of 5 days from the date of entry of such order.”
Hayes Lemmerz Int'l, Inc. v. Epilogics Grp., 531 F. Supp. 2d 789 (E.D. Mich. 2007). “Courts have refused to imply any such obligation in cases such as this where the license contains a merger clause, (License at § 15.6, Kuhl’s Non-Patent Resp. Ex. 1), the li-censor retains the right to revert to a nonexclusive license if the royalties paid fall below a certain…”
E R Drugs v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “Likewise, Section 15.6 [sic, 14.6] of the General Information for Providers Chapter expressly stated at all times relevant to this matter that providers must maintain “[c]opies of purchase invoices for items offered or supplied to the beneficiary.”
Argent Int'l Inc v. Mi Occupational Saf. & Health Admin (Mich. Ct. App. 2026). “] These standards apply “to general industry workers who may be exposed to the unexpected energization, startup, or release of hazardous energy while performing servicing and maintenance on machines and equipment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.