THE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET ACT
Act 431 of 1984
18.1123 Director; appointment; term; chief information officer.
Sec. 123.
(1) The director of the department of technology, management, and budget shall be appointed by the governor by and with the advice and consent of the senate. The director shall serve at the pleasure of the governor.
(2) The governor shall designate an individual within the department, including, but not limited to, the director of the department, to serve as the chief information officer for this state. The director may serve concurrently as the state chief information officer.
History: 1984, Act 431, Eff. Mar. 29, 1985 ;-- Am. 2018, Act 389, Imd. Eff. Dec. 19, 2018
PopularName Notes:
Act 431
PopularName Notes:
DMB
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
76
cases, 1958–1998 · leading case:
People v. Iaconis, 185 N.W.2d 609 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).
People v. Iaconis, 185 N.W.2d 609 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).
· cites it 4× “153 (Stat Ann 1957 Bev §18.1123); conspiracy to possess 5 grams of heroin, MCLA § 750.”
People v. Sinclair, 186 N.W.2d 767 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).
· cites it 6× “153 [Stat Ann 1957 Rev § 18.1123]), and was sentenced to a prison term of 9-1/2 to 10 years.”
People v. Smith, 188 N.W.2d 16 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).
· cites it 4× “153 (Stat Ann 1957 Rev § 18.1123). On September 26, 1967, a preliminary examination was held and the defendant was bound over to circuit court for trial.”
People v. Charles D. Walker, 189 N.W.2d 234 (Mich. 1971).
· cites it 2× “Defendant's attorney objected on the ground that probable cause must be shown at the preliminary examination and cannot be shown at trial.”
People v. Mallory, 139 N.W.2d 904 (Mich. Ct. App. 1966).
· cites it 2× “153 [Stat Ann 1957 Rev § 18.1123]) in recorder’s court of Detroit.”
People v. Ramsdell, 585 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998).
“§ 18.1123, which provided that "[a]ny person not having a license .”
People v. Barker, 171 N.W.2d 574 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).
· cites it 2× “153 (Stat Ann 1969 Cum Supp, § 18.1123), and sentenced him to serve four to ten years in prison.”
People v. Reeves, 178 N.W.2d 115 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).
· cites it 2× “153 (Stat Ann 1957 Rev § 18.1123), and sentenced him to serve three and one-half years to ten years in prison with a recommendation of a five-year maximum.”
People v. Harper, 113 N.W.2d 808 (Mich. 1962).
“153, Stat Ann 1957 Rev § 18.1123): “Any person not having a license * * * who shall possess or have under his or her control any narcotic drug shall be deemed guilty of a felony.”
People v. Haynes, 147 N.W.2d 714 (Mich. Ct. App. 1967).
· cites it 2× “153 (Stat Ann 1957 Rev § 18.1123). [3] "In every criminal prosecution, the accused shall have the right to a speedy and public trial.”
People v. Valot, 189 N.W.2d 873 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).
· cites it 2× “153 (Stat Ann 1957 Rev § 18.1123). He was convicted by nonjury trial.”
People v. Thomas, 170 N.W.2d 286 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).
· cites it 2× “153 (Stat Ann 1957 Rev § 18.1123). The trial court gave the following charge: “Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury: You have heard the testimony in this case and arguments of the attorneys.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.