Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 2.1 (2026)
Area of state; basis.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
STATE AREA
Act 78 of 1945
2.1 Area of state; basis.
Sec. 1.
The total area of the state of Michigan is hereby declared to be 96,720 square miles consisting of 57,022 square miles of land and 39,698 square miles of inland water as based upon the boundaries of the state of Michigan according to article I, section 1 of the constitution of the state of Michigan of 1909, and United States statutes at large, volume 5, page 49, chapter 99, approved June 15, 1836.
History: 1945, Act 78, Eff. Sept. 6, 1945 ;-- CL 1948, 2.1
Compiler's Notes:
In this section, “article I, section 1 of the constitution of the state of Michigan of 1909” evidently refers to the Constitution of 1908. There is no comparable provision in the Constitution of 1963.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 65
cases (13 in the last 5 years), 1960–2025 · leading case: Paris Meadows, LLC v. City of Kentwood, 783 N.W.2d 133 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010).
Paris Meadows, LLC v. City of Kentwood, 783 N.W.2d 133 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010). “The general common elements include “[t]he land (including air space) described in Section 2.1 [setting forth the legal description of the condominium project] of this Master Deed (except for any land which is part of a Condominium Unit and any portion designated in Exhibit B as…”
Lothian v. City of Detroit, 324 N.W.2d 9 (Mich. 1982). “See Title 9, chapter 7 of the Charter of the City of Detroit, Article 6, Section 2.1. Plaintiff was an eligible employee as of the date of his police retirement.”
Alpha Capital Mgmt., Inc. v. Rentenbach, 792 N.W.2d 344 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010). “Section 2.1 required an initial payment of $75,000 at the closing and § 2.”
Square Lake Hills Condo. Ass'n v. Bloomfield Twp., 471 N.W.2d 321 (Mich. 1991). “Section 2.1. The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be interpreted and applied as minimum standards and requirements for the promotion and protection of the public health, safety and welfare, and for the public peace and preservation of natural resources and public and…”
Sitz v. Dep't of State Police, 506 N.W.2d 209 (Mich. 1993). “" 1 LaFave & Israel, Criminal Procedure, § 2.1, p 56 and n 1. Subsequent decisions of the Burger Court were characterized by some commentators as pulling back from, suspending, or weakening the scope of constitutional protections, including the specific guarantees of the Bill of…”
In re Spiech Farms, LLC, 592 B.R. 152 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2018). “at § 2.1). Under the Agreement, Produce Pay could, in its sole discretion, purchase a Distributed Asset Pool for the "Asset Pool Purchase Price.”
United States v. Narciso, 446 F. Supp. 252 (E.D. Mich. 1977). “8(b) (1971), ABA Standards Relating to Fair Trial and Free Press, § 2.1(6) (1968), and the Rules of the Department of Justice, 28 CFR §§ 50.”
Lefkowitz v. Michigan Trucking, LLC (In Re Gainey Corp.), 447 B.R. 807 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2011). “Sale Order, APA, § 2.1 (a)(iii)(A); § 2.1(a)(iii)(A)(ll). The insurance contracts included coverages for bodily injuries and property damage, “that occurred during the policy year of 6/1/2009 through 5/31/2010.”
In Re Complaint of Mcleodusa Telecomm. Servs., Inc, 751 N.W.2d 508 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “5 of the bilateral form gives some validity to the argument that, if the parties intended to modify the stock permit terms, the bilateral agreement form should have been used.”
Ajuba Int'l, L.L.C. v. Saharia, 871 F. Supp. 2d 671 (E.D. Mich. 2012). “B at § 2.1). The agreement expressly acknowledged that the 2005 Noncompetition Agreement was a separate contract not covered or superseded by the subject matter of the Employment Agreement.”
Hadix v. Johnson, 694 F. Supp. 259 (E.D. Mich. 1988). “If, as a result of the above summary, it is determined that the hours provided during the preceding six (6) months do not meet or exceed one-half of the minimum hours required for that period stated in subsection 2.1 of the STATEMENT OF WORK, a pro-rata adjustment will be made…”
Adams Outdoor Advert., Inc v. City of Holland, 625 N.W.2d 377 (Mich. 2001). “Holland City Charter, § 2.1(10). Pursuant to it, defendant enacted the regulations at issue as part of its zoning code.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 2.1(10) — 1 case
Adams Outdoor Advert., Inc v. City of Holland, 625 N.W.2d 377 (Mich. 2001). “Holland City Charter, § 2.1(10). Pursuant to it, defendant enacted the regulations at issue as part of its zoning code.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 2.1(45) — 1 case
City of Detroit, Michigan (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2023).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 2.1(6) — 1 case
United States v. Narciso, 446 F. Supp. 252 (E.D. Mich. 1977). “8(b) (1971), ABA Standards Relating to Fair Trial and Free Press, § 2.1(6) (1968), and the Rules of the Department of Justice, 28 CFR §§ 50.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 2.1(a) — 3 cases
Detroit Fire Fighters Ass'n v. City of Detroit, 339 N.W.2d 230 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983).
Automation Controls & Eng'g, LLC v. Felsomat USA, Inc. (E.D. Mich. 2020).
Mathers v. Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen, Local 1, 779 F. Supp. 914 (W.D. Mich. 1991).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 2.1(a)(ii)(5) — 1 case
People v. Stevens, 206 N.W.2d 757 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 2.1(a)(iii) — 1 case
Lefkowitz v. Michigan Trucking, LLC (In Re Gainey Corp.), 447 B.R. 807 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2011). “Sale Order, APA, § 2.1 (a)(iii)(A); § 2.1(a)(iii)(A)(ll). The insurance contracts included coverages for bodily injuries and property damage, “that occurred during the policy year of 6/1/2009 through 5/31/2010.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 2.1(a)(iii)(A)(ll) — 1 case
Lefkowitz v. Michigan Trucking, LLC (In Re Gainey Corp.), 447 B.R. 807 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2011). “Sale Order, APA, § 2.1 (a)(iii)(A); § 2.1(a)(iii)(A)(ll). The insurance contracts included coverages for bodily injuries and property damage, “that occurred during the policy year of 6/1/2009 through 5/31/2010.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 2.1(b) — 1 case
Rottler v. Michigan Auto. Compressor, Inc., 673 F. Supp. 2d 560 (E.D. Mich. 2009).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 2.1(d) — 1 case
Taylor v. Humphries, 402 F. Supp. 2d 840 (W.D. Mich. 2005).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 2.1(f) — 1 case
Kevorkian v. Thompson, 947 F. Supp. 1152 (E.D. Mich. 1997).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 2.1(h) — 1 case
Tower Auto. Operations USA I LLC v. Vari-Form Mfg., Inc. (E.D. Mich. 2024).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.