Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 2 / Act 247 of 2023
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 2.19 (2026)

State native grain.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

STATE NATIVE GRAIN


Act 247 of 2023


2.19 State native grain.

Sec. 1.

    Manoomin (Zizania palustris and Zizania aquatica), also known as Michigan wild rice, is designated as the official native grain of this state. Let it be known that manoomin is a sacred and important component to many wetlands and has a cultural significance to indigenous people of this state.

    

History: 2023, Act 247, Eff. Feb. 13, 2024

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1973–2024 · leading case: JAC Holding Enter., Inc. v. Atrium Capital Partners, LLC, 997 F. Supp. 2d 710 (E.D. Mich. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
JAC Holding Enter., Inc. v. Atrium Capital Partners, LLC, 997 F. Supp. 2d 710 (E.D. Mich. 2014). · cites it 2× “and there had been material adverse changes to [JAC’s financial position] since December 31, 2009, as specified in Section 2.8(a) of the Agreement; there existed material contracts to which JAC and its subsidiaries were parties but which were not specified in Section 2.”
Coger v. MacKinaw Prods. Co., 210 N.W.2d 124 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973). “Based upon § 2.19 of the USA Standard Safety Code, which defines the *118 elements of a power press, 1 the witness found that the log splitter met the definition and the various guard-type safety devices described in Federal Department of Labor Bulletin #197, admitted as…”
Comm. for Marshall-Not the Megasite v. City of Marshall (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “See Marshall Charter, § 2.19. Article IV of the City’s charter states that all “legislation of the city shall be by ordinance or resolution.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 2.19(f) — 1 case
JAC Holding Enter., Inc. v. Atrium Capital Partners, LLC, 997 F. Supp. 2d 710 (E.D. Mich. 2014). “and there had been material adverse changes to [JAC’s financial position] since December 31, 2009, as specified in Section 2.8(a) of the Agreement; there existed material contracts to which JAC and its subsidiaries were parties but which were not specified in Section 2.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.