Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.67 (2026)
Repealed. 1999, Act 123, Eff. Dec. 31, 1999.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
THE GENERAL PROPERTY TAX ACT
Act 206 of 1893
211.67 Repealed. 1999, Act 123, Eff. Dec. 31, 1999.
Repealed. 1999, Act 123, Eff. Dec. 31, 1999.
Compiler's Notes:
The repealed sections pertained to judgment and form; vesting of title in state; conveyance of lands to state; and land sold for taxes subject to easement, right of way, permit, grant, or dedication.
PopularName Notes:
Act 206Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1964–2021 · leading case: Smith v. Cliffs on the Bay Condo. Ass'n, 617 N.W.2d 536 (Mich. 2000).
Smith v. Cliffs on the Bay Condo. Ass'n, 617 N.W.2d 536 (Mich. 2000). “MCL 211.67; MSA 7.112. Another redemption period is the first Tuesday in November after title vests in the state.”
Lakes of the North Ass'n v. TWIGA Ltd. P'ship, 614 N.W.2d 682 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “Pursuant to MCL 211.67; MSA 7.112, the trial court entered an order of judgment in favor of the state of Michigan on each parcel because the 1988 taxes were unpaid.”
Matter of Sabec, 137 B.R. 659 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 1992). ““Following the hearing, if the court decides that a sale is appropriate, the court enters judgment directing a sale, the time and place of the sale, and appointing the person responsible for conducting the sale.”
Ross v. State of Michigan, 662 N.W.2d 36 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “” Detroit v Adamo, 234 Mich App 235, 237 ; 593 NW2d 646 (1999), rev’d on other grounds 466 Mich 890 (2002); see MCL 211.67. *56 Thereafter, another redemption period arises until the first Tuesday in November.”
Dow v. State of Michigan, 240 N.W.2d 450 (Mich. 1976). “82 was owing, the state could not forfeit an ownership equity, worth many times that amount, if prompt payment were forthcoming.”
Dean v. Dep't of Nat. Resources, 247 N.W.2d 876 (Mich. 1976). “On April 4, 1967, absent plaintiff Penny Dean, the Genesee County Circuit Court issued a judgment pursuant to MCLA 211.67; MSA 7.112 that the amount of the taxes alleged to be delinquent in the State Treasurer’s petition was valid, and that in default of payment, the property in…”
City of Grand Rapids v. Green, 466 N.W.2d 388 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991). “Defendants sought a judgment against plaintiffs and an order from the court that title in the subject properties be vested in them free and clear of any interest of plaintiffs.”
City of Flint v. Takacs, 449 N.W.2d 699 (Mich. Ct. App. 1989). “We disagree because different statutory provisions of the General Property Tax Act are controlling when lands subject to a tax sale are bid off to the state and the state subsequently becomes vested with absolute title after the expiration of the redemption period provided by…”
Dow v. State, 207 N.W.2d 441 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973). “MCLA 211.67; MSA 7.112. After title to tax delinquent lands becomes absolute in the state, neither the Auditor General nor the county treasurer has authority to accept the defaulted taxes, with interests and penalties thereon, and thereupon release or nullify the state's title…”
Howard v. City of Detroit, 73 F. App'x 90 (6th Cir. 2003). “Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.67 . Once title is vested in the state, owners have an additional right of redemption pursuant to Section 131c of the GPTA, Mich.”
WAYNE CTY. Exec. v. Mayor of the City of Detroit, 535 N.W.2d 199 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995). “MCL 211.67; MSA 7.112. Once this occurs, all taxes, special assessments, and liens that are charged against the property must be canceled.”
City of Detroit v. Adamo, 593 N.W.2d 646 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “MCL 211.67; MSA 7.112, MCL 211.67a; MSA 7.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.