Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 24 / Act 306 of 1969
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 24.247 (2026)

Effective date of rules; withdrawal or rescission of promulgated rules; notice of withdrawal.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT OF 1969


Act 306 of 1969


24.247 Effective date of rules; withdrawal or rescission of promulgated rules; notice of withdrawal.

Sec. 47.

    (1) Except for a rule processed under section 48, a rule becomes effective on the date fixed in the rule, which must not be earlier than 7 days after the date of promulgation, or, if a date is not fixed in the rule, 7 days after the date of promulgation.

    (2) Except for a rule processed under section 48, an agency may withdraw a promulgated rule that has not become effective by filing a written request stating reasons for withdrawal to the secretary of state on or before the last day for filing rules for the interim period in which the rules were first filed, or by filing a written request for withdrawal to the secretary of state and the office, within a reasonable time, as determined by the office, after the last day for filing and before publication of the rule in the next supplement to the code. In any other circumstances, an agency may abrogate its rule only by rescission. If an agency has withdrawn a promulgated rule, it shall give notice, stating reasons, to the committee that the rule has been withdrawn.

    (3) Sections 45 and 45a apply to rules for which a public hearing has not been held by April 1, 2000.

    

    

History: 1969, Act 306, Eff. July 1, 1970 ;-- Am. 1971, Act 171, Imd. Eff. Dec. 2, 1971 ;-- Am. 1977, Act 108, Eff. Jan. 1, 1978 ;-- Am. 1999, Act 262, Eff. Apr. 1, 2000 ;-- Am. 2018, Act 267, Imd. Eff. June 29, 2018 ;-- Am. 2024, Act 9, Eff. Apr. 2, 2025

PopularName Notes:

Act 306

PopularName Notes:

APA
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1978–2014 · leading case: In re Consumers Energy Co., 307 Mich. App. 32 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Consumers Energy Co., 307 Mich. App. 32 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “” We do not, however, perceive any reason why promulgation and implementation cannot occur contemporaneously, particularly because promulgation does not establish when a rule goes into effect: absent exceptional circumstances, “a rule becomes effective on the date fixed in the…”
Michigan Oil Co. v. Nat. Resources Comm'n, 276 N.W.2d 141 (Mich. 1979). · cites it 2× “[12] MCL 24.247(1); MSA 3.560(147)(1). [13] Intervenor suggests that an opinion of the Attorney General, OAG, 1971-1972, No.”
People v. Rowe, 270 N.W.2d 472 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 2× “Defendant was not denied proper constitutional notice where the addition of Diazepam to Schedule 4 did not become effective until 15 days after the date of filing with the Secretary of State, as required by MCL 24.247; MSA 3.560(147). Defendant’s attempted analogy to the Federal…”
Barkau v. Ruggirello, 300 N.W.2d 342 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980). “MCL 24.247; MSA 3.560(147). A rule may not be promulgated until after the Legislature adopts a concurrent resolution approving the rule.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 24.247(1): 2 cases
In re Consumers Energy Co., 307 Mich. App. 32 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). “” We do not, however, perceive any reason why promulgation and implementation cannot occur contemporaneously, particularly because promulgation does not establish when a rule goes into effect: absent exceptional circumstances, “a rule becomes effective on the date fixed in the…”
Michigan Oil Co. v. Nat. Resources Comm'n, 276 N.W.2d 141 (Mich. 1979). “[12] MCL 24.247(1); MSA 3.560(147)(1). [13] Intervenor suggests that an opinion of the Attorney General, OAG, 1971-1972, No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.