Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 28 / Act 163 of 1974
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.211a (2026)

Definitions.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

C.J.I.S. POLICY COUNCIL ACT


Act 163 of 1974


28.211a Definitions.

Sec. 1a.

    As used in this act:

    (a) "Council" means the criminal justice information policy council created in section 2.

    (b) "Nonpublic information" means information to which access, use, or dissemination is restricted by a law or rule of this state or the United States.

History: Add. 2005, Act 309, Eff. Feb. 1, 2006

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2016–2019 · leading case: People of Michigan v. Michael Anthony Calabrese (Mich. Ct. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People of Michigan v. Michael Anthony Calabrese (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “MCL 28.214 provides, in relevant part: (3) A person shall not access, use, or disclose nonpublic information governed under this act for personal use or gain.”
Michigan Open Carry Inc v. Dep't of State Police (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “See MCL 28.211a(a). The Council was “created in the department of state police.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.211a(a): 2 cases
People of Michigan v. Michael Anthony Calabrese (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “MCL 28.214 provides, in relevant part: (3) A person shall not access, use, or disclose nonpublic information governed under this act for personal use or gain.”
Michigan Open Carry Inc v. Dep't of State Police (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “See MCL 28.211a(a). The Council was “created in the department of state police.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.211a(b): 1 case
People of Michigan v. Michael Anthony Calabrese (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “MCL 28.214 provides, in relevant part: (3) A person shall not access, use, or disclose nonpublic information governed under this act for personal use or gain.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.