FIREARMS
Act 372 of 1927
28.425 Concealed pistol application kits.
Sec. 5.
(1) County clerks shall provide concealed pistol application kits during normal business hours and free of charge to individuals who wish to apply for licenses to carry concealed pistols. Each kit shall only contain all of the following:
(a) A concealed pistol license application form provided by the director of the department of state police.
(b) The fingerprint cards under section 5b(10), if required.
(c) Written information regarding the procedures involved in obtaining a license to carry a concealed pistol.
(d) Written information identifying entities that offer the training required under section 5b(7)(c), if maintained by the county clerk.
(2) A county clerk shall not deny an individual the right to receive a concealed pistol application kit under this section.
(3) An individual who is denied an application kit under this section and obtains an order of mandamus directing the county clerk to provide him or her with the application kit shall be awarded his or her actual and reasonable costs and attorney fees for obtaining the order.
(4) The department of state police shall provide the application kits required under this section to county clerks in an electronic format. The department of state police shall not charge a fee for the kits.
History: Add. 2000, Act 381, Eff. July 1, 2001 ;-- Am. 2015, Act 3, Eff. Dec. 1, 2015
PopularName Notes:
CCW
PopularName Notes:
Concealed Weapons
PopularName Notes:
CPL
PopularName Notes:
Right to Carry
PopularName Notes:
Shall Issue
Notes of Decisions
Michigan United Conservation Clubs v. Sec'y of State, 630 N.W.2d 376 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001).
“(b) Providing concealed pistol application kits to county sheriffs, local police agencies, and county clerks for distribution under [MCL 28.425]. (c) The fingerprint analysis and comparison reports required under [MCL 28.”
People v. James J. Anderson, 153 N.W.2d 885 (Mich. Ct. App. 1967).
“228 (Stat Aun 1962 Rev § 28.425). “Safety inspection — Any person who shall fail to comply with the provision of section 9 of Act No 372 of the Publie Aets of 1927, being section 16758 of the Compiled Laws of 1929, pertaining to.”
in Re Gregg Bryan Knight (Mich. Ct. App. 2020).
“424, as amended by 1992 PA 219 ; MCL 28.425 as amended by 2000 PA 381 . Effective December 1, 2015, however, concealed weapons licensing boards were abolished and the county clerk became responsible for many of the duties previously held by the concealed weapons licensing board.”
Twp. of James v. Daniel Rice (Mich. 2022).
“425(3) (providing that an individual who obtains mandamus relief after having been denied a concealed weapon application kit “shall be awarded his or her actual and reasonable costs and attorney fees”); MCL 500.3148(1) 1 In the context of the costs provision, “[c]osts will be…”
Twp. of James v. Daniel Rice (Mich. 2022).
“425(3) (providing that an individual who obtains mandamus relief after having been denied a concealed weapon application kit “shall be awarded his or her actual and reasonable costs and attorney fees”); MCL 500.3148(1) 1 In the context of the costs provision, “[c]osts will be…”
Twp. of James v. Daniel Rice (Mich. 2022).
“425(3) (providing that an individual who obtains mandamus relief after having been denied a concealed weapon application kit “shall be awarded his or her actual and reasonable costs and attorney fees”); MCL 500.3148(1) 1 In the context of the costs provision, “[c]osts will be…”
20231130_C362118_36_362118.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
“224a(1), unless the person “holds a valid license to carry a concealed pistol under section 5b of 1927 PA 372 , MCL 28.425, and . . . has been trained under [MCL 750.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.425(3) — 3 cases
Twp. of James v. Daniel Rice (Mich. 2022).
“425(3) (providing that an individual who obtains mandamus relief after having been denied a concealed weapon application kit “shall be awarded his or her actual and reasonable costs and attorney fees”); MCL 500.3148(1) 1 In the context of the costs provision, “[c]osts will be…”
Twp. of James v. Daniel Rice (Mich. 2022).
“425(3) (providing that an individual who obtains mandamus relief after having been denied a concealed weapon application kit “shall be awarded his or her actual and reasonable costs and attorney fees”); MCL 500.3148(1) 1 In the context of the costs provision, “[c]osts will be…”
Twp. of James v. Daniel Rice (Mich. 2022).
“425(3) (providing that an individual who obtains mandamus relief after having been denied a concealed weapon application kit “shall be awarded his or her actual and reasonable costs and attorney fees”); MCL 500.3148(1) 1 In the context of the costs provision, “[c]osts will be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.