Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 324 / Act 451 of 1994
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.5908 (2026)

State tax commission; rules; administration of part.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT


Act 451 of 1994


324.5908 State tax commission; rules; administration of part.

Sec. 5908.

    The state tax commission may adopt rules as it considers necessary for the administration of this part. These rules shall not abridge the authority of the department to determine whether or not air pollution control exists within the meaning of this part.

History: Add. 1995, Act 60, Imd. Eff. May 24, 1995

PopularName Notes:

Act 451

PopularName Notes:

NREPA
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 2008–2015 · leading case: City of Sterling Heights v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 873 N.W.2d 342 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Sterling Heights v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 873 N.W.2d 342 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “5901 through MCL 324.5908], “facility” means machinery, equipment, structures, or any part or accessories of machinery, equipment, or structures, installed or acquired for the primary purpose of controlling or disposing of air pollution that if released would render the air…”
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. State Tax Comm'n, 482 Mich. 220 (Mich. 2008). · cites it 2× “] MCL 324.5908 provides that although the STC may adopt rules considered necessary for administration of part 59 of NREPA, “[t]hese rules shall not abridge the authority of the department to determine whether or not air pollution control exists within the meaning of this part.”
Ford Motor Co. v. State Tax Comm'n (Mich. 2008). “] MCL 324.5908 provides that although the STC may adopt rules considered necessary for administration of part 59 of NREPA, “[t]hese rules shall not abridge the authority of the department to determine whether or not air pollution control exists within the meaning of this part.”
Ford Motor Co. v. Michigan State Tax Comm'n (Mich. 2008). “] MCL 324.5908 provides that although the STC may adopt rules considered necessary for administration of part 59 of NREPA, “[t]hese rules shall not abridge the authority of the department to determine whether or not air pollution control exists within the meaning of this part.”
Ford Motor Co v. Michigan State Tax Comm'n (Mich. 2008). “] MCL 324.5908 provides that although the STC may adopt rules considered necessary for administration of part 59 of NREPA, “[t]hese rules shall not abridge the authority of the department to determine whether or not air pollution control exists within the meaning of this part.”
Ford Motor Co v. Michigan State Tax Comm'n (Mich. 2008). “] MCL 324.5908 provides that although the STC may adopt rules considered necessary for administration of part 59 of NREPA, “[t]hese rules shall not abridge the authority of the department to determine whether or not air pollution control exists within the meaning of this part.”
Daimlerchrysler Corp v. Michigan State Tax Comm (Mich. 2008). “] MCL 324.5908 provides that although the STC may adopt rules considered necessary for administration of part 59 of NREPA, “[t]hese rules shall not abridge the authority of the department to determine whether or not air pollution control exists within the meaning of this part.”
Daimlerchrysler Corp v. Michigan State Tax Comm (Mich. 2008). “] MCL 324.5908 provides that although the STC may adopt rules considered necessary for administration of part 59 of NREPA, “[t]hese rules shall not abridge the authority of the department to determine whether or not air pollution control exists within the meaning of this part.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.