Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 325 / Act 399 of 1976

Mich. Comp. Laws § 325.1001

Short title.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT


Act 399 of 1976


325.1001 Short title.

Sec. 1.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "safe drinking water act".

History: 1976, Act 399, Imd. Eff. Jan. 4, 1977

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: Melissa Mays v. Governor Rick Snyder
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Melissa Mays v. Governor Rick Snyder (2018) michctapp · cites it 2× “Defendants argue for the first time on appeal that plaintiffs constitutional tort claims, arising from plaintiffs’ alleged exposure to toxic drinking water, may be vindicated under the federal safe drinking water act (SDWA), 42 USC 300f et seq.”
Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation v. Nestlé Waters North America Inc (2007) mich · cites it 2× “7 MCL 325.1001 et seq. The Legislature subsequently amended the Safe Drinking Water Act and other legislation to further regulate water diversion and bottling in Michigan.”
Mich. Dep't of Envtl. Quality v. City of Flint (2017) mied “It is undisputed that the Administrator has approved Michigan's conforming regulations and that the state has primary responsibility to enforce the SDWA. Michigan enacted its "no less stringent" drinking water regulations in the Michigan Safe Drinking Water Act (MSDWA) in 1976.”
Nestle Waters North America Inc v. Osceola Township (2019) michctapp · cites it 2× “1002(p), part of the Michigan Safe Drinking Water Act (MSDWA), MCL 325.1001 et seq. We will discuss below why we disagree with this contention.”
Melissa Mays v. Governor Rick Snyder (2020) mich · cites it 2× “, and the Michigan Safe Drinking Water Act (MSDWA), MCL 325.1001 et seq. We disagree. The SDWA and MSDWA do not provide a right to address constitutional violations.”
Melissa Mays v. Governor Rick Snyder (2020) mich · cites it 2× “, and the Michigan Safe Drinking Water Act (MSDWA), MCL 325.1001 et seq. We disagree. The SDWA and MSDWA do not provide a right to address constitutional violations.”
Melissa Mays v. Governor Rick Snyder (2018) michctapp “Defendants argue for the first time on appeal that plaintiffs constitutional tort claims, arising from plaintiffs’ alleged exposure to toxic drinking water, may be vindicated under the federal safe drinking water act (SDWA), 42 USC 300f et seq.”
Takarie Nappier v. Governor (2019) michctapp “Second, defendants argued that the Michigan Safe Drinking Water Act (MSDWA), MCL 325.1001 et seq., preempts common-law claims falling within its scope and plaintiffs’ claims for negligence and/or gross negligence are based on duties imposed by the MSDWA.”
Autumn Acres Senior Village Inc v. Village of Mayville (2019) michctapp “343492, defendant appeals by right the same order dismissing its counterclaims seeking declaratory relief on the basis that plaintiff violated the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), MCL 325.1001 et seq., and the Village of Mayville Code.”
Grant Bauserman v. Unemployment Insurance Agency (2019) michctapp “and the Michigan Safe Drinking Water Act, (MSDWA), MCL 325.1001 et seq. “do not provide an alternative remedy for plaintiffs’ claim of injury to bodily integrity” as a result of the alleged contamination of their water supply).”
3m Company v. Department of Environment Great Lakes and Energy (2023) michctapp “BACKGROUND At issue is a new set of rules promulgated by EGLE that regulate the permissible levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in drinking water pursuant to Section 5 of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), MCL 325.1001 et seq.1 It is undisputed that…”
MacKinaw Area Tourist Bureau Inc v. Village of MacKinaw City (2024) michctapp “Defendant, Village of Mackinaw City (the Village), was informed by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)1 that it was out of compliance with the Michigan Safe Drinking Water Act, MCL 325.1001 et seq. (Act 399), due to insufficient water storage capacity, and…”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.