Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 338 / Act 333 of 1976
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 338.2151 (2026)

Definitions.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

ELEVATOR LICENSING


Act 333 of 1976


338.2151 Definitions.

Sec. 1.

    (1) The definitions contained in Act No. 227 of the Public Acts of 1967, being sections 408.801 to 408.824 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, shall have the same meaning when used in this act.

    (2) "Elevator journeyman" means a person who is qualified and licensed by this state to perform, or to provide supervision in the performance of, the work of installation, alteration, maintenance, repair, servicing, adjusting, inspecting, or testing of elevators.

History: 1976, Act 333, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2026–2026 · leading case: Brandon Bunkelman v. Dept of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs (Mich. Ct. App. 2026).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Brandon Bunkelman v. Dept of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs (Mich. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 8× “OVERVIEW OF RELEVANT STATUTORY SCHEMES Two statutory schemes govern elevator-related licensure in Michigan: the elevator licensing act (the ELA), MCL 338.2151 et seq., and the elevator safety board act, MCL 408.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 338.2151(1): 1 case
Brandon Bunkelman v. Dept of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs (Mich. Ct. App. 2026). “OVERVIEW OF RELEVANT STATUTORY SCHEMES Two statutory schemes govern elevator-related licensure in Michigan: the elevator licensing act (the ELA), MCL 338.2151 et seq., and the elevator safety board act, MCL 408.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 338.2151(2): 1 case
Brandon Bunkelman v. Dept of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs (Mich. Ct. App. 2026). “OVERVIEW OF RELEVANT STATUTORY SCHEMES Two statutory schemes govern elevator-related licensure in Michigan: the elevator licensing act (the ELA), MCL 338.2151 et seq., and the elevator safety board act, MCL 408.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.