Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.2802 (2026)
Costs of litigation.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
ELLIOTT-LARSEN CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
Act 453 of 1976
37.2802 Costs of litigation.
Sec. 802.
A court, in rendering a judgment in an action brought pursuant to this article, may award all or a portion of the costs of litigation, including reasonable attorney fees and witness fees, to the complainant in the action if the court determines that the award is appropriate.
History: 1976, Act 453, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 58
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1981–2025 · leading case: Smith v. Khouri, 751 N.W.2d 472 (Mich. 2008).
Smith v. Khouri, 751 N.W.2d 472 (Mich. 2008). “66, and the Michigan Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2802, each of which involves reasonable attorney fees? And if today's rule only applies to MCR 2.”
Schellenberg v. Rochester, Michigan, Lodge No 2225 of the Benevolent & Prot. Order of Elks of the United States of Am., 577 N.W.2d 163 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “MCL 37.2802; MSA 3.548(802); McLemore v Detroit Receiving Hosp, [ 196 Mich App 391 ; 493 NW2d 441 (1992).”
Rafferty v. Markovitz, 602 N.W.2d 367 (Mich. 1999). “[MCL 37.2802; MSA 3.548(802).] MCR 2.403(O) provides that if a party has rejected a unanimous mediation evaluation and the case proceeds to verdict, the party must pay the opposing party's actual costs if both have rejected the evaluation and the verdict is more favorable to the…”
Theodore Cadwell v. City of Highland Park, 922 N.W.2d 639 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “2d 441 , this Court has held that it is appropriate to consider caselaw interpreting MCL 37.2802 under the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act because the language used in MCL 37.”
Rembert v. Ryan’s Fam. Steak Houses, Inc, 596 N.W.2d 208 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “§§ 37.2802; 37.1606(3); M.S.A. §§ 3.548(802); 3.”
Dresselhouse v. Chrysler Corp., 442 N.W.2d 705 (Mich. Ct. App. 1989). “Plaintiff, on the other hand, argued that mediation sanctions could not properly be imposed because she had improved her position by more than ten percent when considering the attorney fees payable to her from Chrysler, pursuant to the lower court’s judgment, and also allegedly…”
Matras v. Amoco Oil Co., 385 N.W.2d 586 (Mich. 1986). “[1] The FEPA was subsequently repealed and its substantive provisions reenacted in the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.”
King v. Gen. Motors Corp., 356 N.W.2d 626 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984). “In post-trial proceedings, plaintiff moved for attorney fees under § 802 of the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2802; MSA 3.548(802). The trial court denied the motion on the ground that attorney fees *307 should be awarded only where plaintiff could not otherwise have…”
Rasheed v. Chrysler Corp., 517 N.W.2d 19 (Mich. 1994). “, simply permit "appropriate injunctive relief or damages, or both," MCL 37.”
McLemore v. Detroit Receiving Hosp. & Univ. Med. Ctr., 493 N.W.2d 441 (Mich. Ct. App. 1992). “MCL 37.2802; MSA 3.548(802); MCR 2.625(F).”
Lease Acceptance Corp. v. Adams, 724 N.W.2d 724 (Mich. Ct. App. 2006). “2d 182 (2000) (recognizing that the trial court may award reasonable attorney fees pursuant to the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2802, and that the decision is reviewed for an abuse of discretion), Featherston v.”
Meyer v. City of Ctr. Line, 619 N.W.2d 182 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “Section 802 of the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2802; MSA 3.548(802), provides: A court, in rendering a judgment in an action brought pursuant to this article, may award all or a portion of the *576 costs of litigation, including reasonable attorney fees and witness fees, to the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.