Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 38.1379 (2026)

Actuarial cost; recomputation.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ACT OF 1979


Act 300 of 1980


38.1379 Actuarial cost; recomputation.

Sec. 79.

    (1)  Actuarial cost shall be equal to the product of subdivisions (a), (b), and (c):

    (a) A percentage, determined by the retirement board and the department, which when multiplied by a member's compensation, as determined under subdivision (b), results in the average actuarial present value of the additional benefits resulting from the crediting of 1 additional year of service. The percentage may vary because of age, credited service, or benefit coverage. An increase or decrease in the percentage under this subdivision shall not become effective before the expiration of 6 months or more after the retirement board notifies the reporting units of the increase or decrease.

    (b) A member's compensation. The member's compensation shall be the member's full-time or equated full-time compensation earned in the school fiscal year immediately before the school fiscal year in which the application to purchase and payment for the service are made. The compensation amount used shall not be less than the highest compensation previously earned by the member.

    (c) The number of years, including any fraction of a year, of credited service a member elects to purchase up to the maximum allowed.

    (2) If the compensation amount used for computing payment under this section exceeds the member's final average compensation determined at the time of retirement, the payment required under this section shall be recomputed using the member's final average compensation and a refund shall be made based upon the recomputation.

History: Add. 1989, Act 194, Imd. Eff. Aug. 25, 1989

PopularName Notes:

Act 300
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2005–2005 · leading case: Studier v. Michigan Pub. Sch. Employees' Ret. Bd., 698 N.W.2d 350 (Mich. 2005).
Studier v. Michigan Pub. Sch. Employees' Ret. Bd., 698 N.W.2d 350 (Mich. 2005). · cites it 2× “1309; MCL 38.1379; MCL 38.1384. However, this does not mean that the state is absolved of its responsibility to fulfill its obligations.”
Alberta Studier v. Michigan Pub. Schl Emp Ret. Bd (Mich. 2005). “1309; MCL 38.1379; MCL 38.1384. However, this does not mean that the state is absolved of its responsibility to fulfill its obligations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.