Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 388.1614 (2026)

Defective data; duties of department.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE STATE SCHOOL AID ACT OF 1979


Act 94 of 1979


388.1614 Defective data; duties of department.

Sec. 14.

    If the data from an intermediate district or district upon which a statement of the amount to be disbursed or paid are determined to be defective or incomplete, making it impracticable to ascertain the apportionment to be disbursed or paid, the department shall withhold the amount of the apportionment that cannot be ascertained until the department is able to ascertain by the best evidence available the facts upon which the ratio and amount of the apportionment depend, and then shall make the apportionment accordingly.

History: 1979, Act 94, Eff. Oct. 1, 1979 ;-- Am. 1993, Act 175, Eff. Oct. 1, 1993 ;-- Am. 1993, Act 336, Eff. Oct. 1, 1994 ;-- Am. 2006, Act 342, Eff. Oct. 1, 2006

Compiler's Notes:

    Enacting section 1 of Act 342 of 2006 provides:

    "Enacting section 1. (1) In accordance with section 30 of article I of the state constitution of 1963, total state spending in this amendatory act from state sources for fiscal year 2006-2007 is estimated at $11,682,508,200.00 and state appropriations to be paid to local units of government for fiscal year 2006-2007 are estimated at $11,536,597,200.00.

    (2) In accordance with section 30 of article I of the state constitution of 1963, total state spending from state sources for fiscal year 2005-2006 in this amendatory act and 2005 PA 155 is estimated at $11,308,027,200.00 and state appropriations to be paid to local units of government for fiscal year 2004-2005 are estimated at $11,285,376,300.00."

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2015–2015 · leading case: Galien Twp. Sch. Dist v. Superintendent of Pub Instruction, 310 Mich. App. 238 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
Galien Twp. Sch. Dist v. Superintendent of Pub Instruction, 310 Mich. App. 238 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “Galien alternatively argues that the superintendent’s refusal to consider electronic attendance records violated the best-evidence requirement of MCL 388.1614. We review a decision of an administrative agency to determine “ ‘whether the decision was contrary to law, was…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.