Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 4.12 (2026)

Commission on legislative apportionment; membership eligibility; ineligible for election to legislature.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

COMMISSION ON LEGISLATIVE APPORTIONMENT


Act 46 of 1963 (2nd Ex. Sess.)


4.12 Commission on legislative apportionment; membership eligibility; ineligible for election to legislature.

Sec. 2.

    No officers or employees of the federal, state or local governments, excepting notaries public and members of the armed forces reserve, shall be eligible for membership on the commission. Members of the commission shall not be eligible for election to the legislature until 2 years after the apportionment in which they participated becomes effective.

History: 1963, 2nd Ex. Sess., Act 46, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1968–1991 · leading case: Rowe v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 473 N.W.2d 268 (Mich. 1991).
Rowe v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 473 N.W.2d 268 (Mich. 1991). · cites it 8× “[Perritt, supra, § 4.12, pp 197-198. Emphasis omitted.] This is not to say that consideration in addition to rendering services is essential to enforceability in employment cases; it is to say that the more ambiguous the circumstances, the more appropriate it is to look for…”
Milford v. People's Cmty. Hosp. Auth., 155 N.W.2d 835 (Mich. 1968). · cites it 20× “In the supplemental complaint plaintiff claimed that at the annual staff meeting of Beyer Memorial Hospital on January 12, 1965, the executive committee presented a list of those doctors who had been approved for reappointment to the hospital staff pursuant to section 4.12 of…”
People v. Young, 391 N.W.2d 270 (Mich. 1986). · cites it 2× “[55] Moenssens & Inbau, Scientific Evidence in Criminal Cases, § 4.12. [56] Id. See also Jonakait, n 10 supra at 856; Giannelli, n 15 supra at 1225.”
People v. Dupie, 236 N.W.2d 494 (Mich. 1975). · cites it 2× “See, also, Downs, Michigan Juvenile Court; Law and Practice § 4.12. III Defendant complains that his counsel was not permitted to inspect the presentence report prior to sentencing as provided in GCR 1963, 785.”
Regents of the Univ. of Michigan v. State, 208 N.W.2d 871 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff in his supplemental complaint alleges that he was removed from the staff of Beyer Memorial Hospital pursuant to section 4.12 of the staff by-laws, which provides for annual reappointment.”
People v. Poyma, 283 N.W.2d 707 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 4× “Section 4.12 of the charter reads: "Section 4.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.