Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 408.326 (2026)

Rules; proposed legislation establishing fee schedule.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

SKI AREA SAFETY ACT OF 1962


Act 199 of 1962


408.326 Rules; proposed legislation establishing fee schedule.

Sec. 6.

    (1) The board shall promulgate rules for the safe construction, installation, repair, use, operation, maintenance, and inspection of all ski areas and ski lifts as the board finds necessary for protection of the general public while using ski areas and ski lifts. The rules shall be reasonable and based upon generally accepted engineering standards, formulas, and practices.

    (2) The board, with the advice of the commissioner, shall propose legislation to establish the fee schedule for permits, inspections, and plan review activities. The fees shall reflect the actual costs and expenses of the department for issuing permits and conducting inspections and plan reviews.

History: 1962, Act 199, Imd. Eff. June 7, 1962 ;-- Am. 1976, Act 364, Imd. Eff. Dec. 23, 1976 ;-- Am. 1981, Act 86, Imd. Eff. July 2, 1981

Compiler's Notes:

    For transfer of powers and duties of certain occupational functions, boards, and commissions from the Department of Licensing and Regulation to the Department of Commerce, see E.R.O. No. 1991-9, compiled at MCL 338.3501 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

AdminRule Notes:

    R 408.61 et seq. of the Michigan Administrative Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2024 · leading case: McGoldrick v. Holiday Amusements, Inc., 618 N.W.2d 98 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000).
McGoldrick v. Holiday Amusements, Inc., 618 N.W.2d 98 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “MCL 408.326(1); MSA 18.483(6)(1) of the SASA provides for safety inspections of all ski areas and lifts.”
Kent v. Alpine Valley Ski Area, Inc, 613 N.W.2d 383 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “MCL 408.326(1); MSA 18.483(6)(1).” Nonetheless, this Court found that the plaintiff had wrongly relied on Dale v Beta-C, Inc, 227 Mich App 57 ; 574 NW2d 697 (1997), a case holding that pursuant to the Roller Skating Safety Act (rssa), MCL 445.”
McCormick v. Go Forward Operating Ltd. P'ship, 599 N.W.2d 513 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “MCL 408.326(1); MSA 18.483(6)(1). Plaintiffs’ reliance on Dale, supra, is misplaced.”
Trevor Rhoda v. Peter E O'Dovero Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “MCL 408.326 empowers the SASB to “promulgate rules for the safe construction, installation, repair, use, operation, maintenance, and inspection of all ski areas consistent with this act to implement this act .”
Robert Scott Swanson v. Bittersweet Ski Resort Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “MCL 408.326 directs the Ski Area Safety Board (SASB) to “promulgate rules for the safe .”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 408.326(1) — 3 cases
McGoldrick v. Holiday Amusements, Inc., 618 N.W.2d 98 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “MCL 408.326(1); MSA 18.483(6)(1) of the SASA provides for safety inspections of all ski areas and lifts.”
Kent v. Alpine Valley Ski Area, Inc, 613 N.W.2d 383 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “MCL 408.326(1); MSA 18.483(6)(1).” Nonetheless, this Court found that the plaintiff had wrongly relied on Dale v Beta-C, Inc, 227 Mich App 57 ; 574 NW2d 697 (1997), a case holding that pursuant to the Roller Skating Safety Act (rssa), MCL 445.”
McCormick v. Go Forward Operating Ltd. P'ship, 599 N.W.2d 513 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “MCL 408.326(1); MSA 18.483(6)(1). Plaintiffs’ reliance on Dale, supra, is misplaced.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.