Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 418 / Act 317 of 1969
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 418.359 (2026)

Repealed. 1985, Act 103, Imd. Eff. July 10, 1985.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

WORKER'S DISABILITY COMPENSATION ACT OF 1969


Act 317 of 1969


418.359 Repealed. 1985, Act 103, Imd. Eff. July 10, 1985.

    Repealed. 1985, Act 103, Imd. Eff. July 10, 1985.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed section pertained to payments for total disability of employees under 25.

PopularName Notes:

Act 317

PopularName Notes:

Heart and Lung Act
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1973–1984 · leading case: Cruz v. Chevrolet Grey Iron Div. of Gen. Motors Corp., 247 N.W.2d 764 (Mich. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cruz v. Chevrolet Grey Iron Div. of Gen. Motors Corp., 247 N.W.2d 764 (Mich. 1976). · cites it 2× “MCLA 418.359; MSA 17.237(359) permits computation by.”
Morin v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 352 N.W.2d 325 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 4× “Plaintiff was awarded maximum weekly benefits of $127 under MCL 418.359; MSA 17.237(359). Defendants appealed the decision to the WCAB and commenced paying 70% of the weekly benefits as required under MCL 418.”
Higgins v. Monroe Evening News, 245 N.W.2d 769 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976). · cites it 2× “IV The only remaining issue warranting discussion — concerning the applicability of MCLA 418.359; MSA 17.237(359) to this case — is not properly raised or briefed.”
Miller v. Dunn Paper Co., 209 N.W.2d 519 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973). “237(357); MCLA 418.359; MSA 17.237(359). Appellant employer and carrier (and the referee) contend that the fund was liable not only for any differential payments due the employee prior to the expiration date of 500 weeks, but for all benefits thereafter.”
McKenna v. Chevrolet-Saginaw Grey Iron Foundry Div., 234 N.W.2d 526 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 2× “351 through MCLA 418.359; MSA 17.237(351) through (359).”
Schoolenberg v. Meijer, Inc, 309 N.W.2d 548 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 2× “At a hearing before an administrative law judge, plaintiff was held to be entitled to additional payments by virtue of MCL 418.359; MSA 17.237(359). The Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board affirmed the decision.”
Reed v. Top Notch Fence Installers, 307 N.W.2d 460 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “Plaintiff relies upon MCL 418.359; MSA 17.237(359), which states: "Whenever an employee who has not attained his twenty-fifth birthday is injured so that he is entitled to compensation as permanently and totally disabled as defined in this act, if it is established that the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.