Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.7202 (2026)

Terms of receipt; form; contrary provisions.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE


Act 174 of 1962


440.7202 Terms of receipt; form; contrary provisions.

Sec. 7202.

    (1) A warehouse receipt need not be in any particular form.

    (2) Unless a warehouse receipt provides for each of the following, the warehouse is liable for damages caused to a person injured by its omission:

    (a) A statement of the location of the warehouse where the goods are stored.

    (b) The date of issue of the receipt.

    (c) The unique identification code of the receipt.

    (d) A statement whether the goods received will be delivered to the bearer, to a named person, or to a named person or its order.

    (e) The rate of storage and handling charges, unless goods are stored under a field warehousing arrangement, in which case a statement of that fact is sufficient on a nonnegotiable receipt.

    (f) A description of the goods or the packages containing them.

    (g) The signature of the warehouse or its agent.

    (h) If the receipt is issued for goods that the warehouse owners, either solely, jointly, or in common with others, a statement of the fact of that ownership.

    (i) A statement of the amount of advances made and of liabilities incurred for which the warehouse claims a lien or security interest, unless the precise amount of advances made or liabilities incurred, at the time of the issue of the receipt, is unknown to the warehouse or to its agent that issued the receipt, in which case a statement of the fact that advances have been made or liabilities incurred and the purpose of the advances or liabilities is sufficient.

    (3) A warehouse may insert in its receipt any terms that are not contrary to the provisions of this act and do not impair its obligation of delivery under section 7403 or its duty of care under section 7204. Any contrary provisions are ineffective.

History: 1962, Act 174, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 87, Eff. July 1, 2013

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1989–2004 · leading case: Michigan Nat'l Bank v. Michigan Livestock Exch., 439 N.W.2d 884 (Mich. 1989).
Michigan Nat'l Bank v. Michigan Livestock Exch., 439 N.W.2d 884 (Mich. 1989). · cites it 2× “[10] MCL 440.7202(2); MSA 19.7202(2) provides: Unless a warehouse receipt embodies within its written or printed terms each of the following, the warehouseman is liable for damages caused by the omission to a person injured thereby: (a) the location of the warehouse where the…”
Menorah Ins. v. W.F. Whelan Co., 110 F. App'x 524 (6th Cir. 2004). · cites it 3× “*526 The district court, relying on these contractual provisions and Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.7202 (2), granted summary judgment in favor of Whelan.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.7202(2) — 1 case
Michigan Nat'l Bank v. Michigan Livestock Exch., 439 N.W.2d 884 (Mich. 1989). “[10] MCL 440.7202(2); MSA 19.7202(2) provides: Unless a warehouse receipt embodies within its written or printed terms each of the following, the warehouseman is liable for damages caused by the omission to a person injured thereby: (a) the location of the warehouse where the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.