Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.1546 (2026)

Prior acts, offenses, rights, liabilities, penalties, forfeiture, or punishments not impaired or affected; transfer of records, personnel, and funds.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

FRANCHISE INVESTMENT LAW


Act 269 of 1974


445.1546 Prior acts, offenses, rights, liabilities, penalties, forfeiture, or punishments not impaired or affected; transfer of records, personnel, and funds.

Sec. 46.

    (1) This act does not impair or affect any act done, offense committed, or right accruing, accrued, or acquired, or a liability, penalty, forfeiture, or punishment incurred before this act takes effect, but the same may be enjoyed, asserted, and enforced, as fully and to the same extent as if this act had not been passed.

    (2) The department of commerce shall transfer all records related to the administration of this act to the department of attorney general along with personnel and funds sufficient, in the opinion of the attorney general, to carry out this act.

History: Add. 1984, Act 92, Eff. June 20, 1984

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: Oakland Fam. Restaurants, Inc. v. Am. Dairy Queen Corp., No. 2:21-cv-12530 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 31, 2024).
Oakland Fam. Restaurants, Inc. v. Am. Dairy Queen Corp., No. 2:21-cv-12530 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 31, 2024). · cites it 4× “Section 46 of the MFIL, codified in MCL § 445.1546(1), which bears the title “Prior acts, offenses, rights, liabilities, penalties, forfeiture, or punishments not impaired,” contains an anti-impairment clause suggesting that the MFIL was not intended to have any retroactive…”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.1546(1): 1 case
Oakland Fam. Restaurants, Inc. v. Am. Dairy Queen Corp., No. 2:21-cv-12530 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 31, 2024). “Section 46 of the MFIL, codified in MCL § 445.1546(1), which bears the title “Prior acts, offenses, rights, liabilities, penalties, forfeiture, or punishments not impaired,” contains an anti-impairment clause suggesting that the MFIL was not intended to have any retroactive…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.