Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.837 (2026)

False statement; noncompliance; remedies; action pursuant to Michigan consumer protection act; other remedies.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

JOE GAGNON APPLIANCE REPAIR ACT


Act 468 of 2002


445.837 False statement; noncompliance; remedies; action pursuant to Michigan consumer protection act; other remedies.

Sec. 7.

    (1) A service dealer who makes a false statement of a character likely to influence, persuade, or induce a customer to authorize the repair, service, or maintenance of an appliance or who fails to substantially comply with the disclosure requirements of this act is subject to the remedies prescribed by subsection (2).

    (2) A person may bring an action in a court of competent jurisdiction for actual damages resulting from a violation of this act in the amount of his or her actual damages or $250.00, whichever is greater, together with reasonable attorney fees. The court may award up to twice the amount of damages if it finds that the violation of this act was willful.

    (3) This act does not prohibit the attorney general, a prosecuting attorney, or a person who has suffered a loss as a result of a violation of this act from bringing an action pursuant to the Michigan consumer protection act, 1976 PA 331, MCL 445.901 to 445.922, for any act or omission relative to this act.

    (4) The remedies under this section are cumulative and independent. The use of 1 remedy by a person or the department of attorney general shall not bar the use of other lawful remedies, including injunctive relief, by that person or the department of attorney general.

History: 2002, Act 468, Imd. Eff. June 21, 2002

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2019–2019 · leading case: Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2019).
Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “815(2), and the Joe Gagnon Appliance Repair Act under MCL 445.837(2). The Legislature has also enacted statutes that provide individuals causes of action where actual damages are not a condition precedent to suit.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.837(2): 1 case
Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “815(2), and the Joe Gagnon Appliance Repair Act under MCL 445.837(2). The Legislature has also enacted statutes that provide individuals causes of action where actual damages are not a condition precedent to suit.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.