Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 450.2834 (2026)

Dissolved corporation and officers, directors, shareholders, and members; manner of functioning.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NONPROFIT CORPORATION ACT


Act 162 of 1982


450.2834 Dissolved corporation and officers, directors, shareholders, and members; manner of functioning.

Sec. 834.

    Subject to section 833 and except as otherwise provided by court order, a dissolved corporation, its officers, directors, shareholders, and members shall continue to function in the same manner as if dissolution had not occurred. Without limiting the generality of this section:

    (a) The directors of the corporation are not deemed to be trustees of its assets solely because of the fact of dissolution and shall thereby be held to no greater standard of conduct than that prescribed by section 541.

    (b) Title to the corporation's assets remains in the corporation until transferred by it in the corporate name.

    (c) The dissolution does not change quorum or voting requirements for the board, shareholders, or members and does not alter provisions regarding election, appointment, resignation or removal of, or filling vacancies among, directors or officers, or provisions regarding amendment or repeal of bylaws or adoption of new bylaws.

    (d) Shares may be transferred if otherwise authorized.

    (e) The corporation may sue and be sued in its corporate name and process may issue by and against the corporation in the same manner as if dissolution had not occurred.

    (f) An action brought against the corporation before its dissolution does not abate because of the dissolution.

History: 1982, Act 162, Eff. Jan. 1, 1983

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2013–2024 · leading case: Amy McCormick v. Michigan State Univ. Coll. of Law (Mich. Ct. App. 2024).
Amy McCormick v. Michigan State Univ. Coll. of Law (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 3× “” MCL 450.2834. It also provides that a dissolved nonprofit corporation “may sue and be sued in its corporate name .”
Emcasco Ins. Co. v. Woodward-Parker Corp. (E.D. Mich. 2024). “1925(1)] applies retroactively or prospectively to validate ‘all contracts entered into and other rights acquired’ during dissolution; (2) whether renewal pursuant to § 925 permits an administratively dissolved corporation to enforce contracts and rights not related to…”
Scott Woodbury v. Ruth Averill (Mich. 2013). “2833 and MCL 450.2834; (3) whether Bergy Bros, Inc v Zeelend Feeder Pig, Inc, 415 Mich 286 (1980), correctly interpreted MCL 450.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 450.2834(e): 1 case
Amy McCormick v. Michigan State Univ. Coll. of Law (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “” MCL 450.2834. It also provides that a dissolved nonprofit corporation “may sue and be sued in its corporate name .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.