Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 460 / Act 3 of 1939
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 460.10g (2026)

Definitions; school properties.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION


Act 3 of 1939


460.10g Definitions; school properties.

Sec. 10g.

    (1) As used in sections 10 through 10bb:

    (a) "Alternative electric supplier" means a person selling electric generation service to retail customers in this state. Alternative electric supplier does not include a provider of electric vehicle charging services or a person who physically delivers electricity directly to retail customers in this state. An alternative electric supplier is not a public utility.

    (b) "Commission" means the Michigan public service commission created in section 1.

    (c) "Electric utility" means that term as defined in section 10h.

    (d) "Independent transmission owner" means an independent transmission company as that term is defined in section 2 of the electric transmission line certification act, 1995 PA 30, MCL 460.562.

    (e) "Merchant plant" means electric generating equipment and associated facilities with a capacity of more than 100 kilowatts located in this state that are not owned and operated by an electric utility.

    (f) "Relevant market" means either the Upper Peninsula or the Lower Peninsula of this state.

    (g) "Renewable energy source" means energy generated by solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, including waste-to-energy and landfill gas, or hydroelectric.

    (2) A school district aggregating electricity for school properties or an exclusive aggregator for public or private school properties is not an electric utility or a public utility for the purpose of that aggregation.

    

    

History: Add. 2000, Act 141, Imd. Eff. June 5, 2000 ;-- Am. 2001, Act 48, Imd. Eff. July 23, 2001 ;-- Am. 2008, Act 286, Imd. Eff. Oct. 6, 2008 ;-- Am. 2023, Act 245, Imd. Eff. Nov. 30, 2023

PopularName Notes:

Customer Choice and Electricity Reliability Act
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2006–2020 · leading case: Attorney Gen. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 713 N.W.2d 290 (Mich. Ct. App. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Attorney Gen. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 713 N.W.2d 290 (Mich. Ct. App. 2006). “” MCL 460.10g(1)(f). 2 We note that the PSC argues on appeal that, because appellant did not challenge the PSC’s directive that CEC implement a new renewable resources program in its appeal of the May 18, 2004, order (Docket No.”
in Re Reliability Plans of Elec. Utils. for 2017-2021 (Mich. 2020). · cites it 2× “6 with MCL 460.10g(1)(a). Evolving regulatory regimes Historically, geography determined a consumer’s electricity provider.”
in Re Reliability Plans of Elec. Utils. for 2017-2021 (Mich. 2020). · cites it 2× “6 with MCL 460.10g(1)(a). Evolving regulatory regimes Historically, geography determined a consumer’s electricity provider.”
in Re Implementing SEC 6w of 2016 Pa 341 for Cloverland Elec Coop (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “” MCL 460.10g(a). -1- appeal, Cloverland challenges the PSC’s decision to require the implementation of the SRM charge.”
in Re Application of Indiana Michigan Power Co to Increase Rates (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “Although some consumers in this state have the option of obtaining electricity from an AES, petitioner remains obligated to make available its transmission and distribution facilities for that purpose, and also retains a role in ensuring that AESs have sufficient capacity to…”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 460.10g(1)(a): 3 cases
in Re Reliability Plans of Elec. Utils. for 2017-2021 (Mich. 2020). “6 with MCL 460.10g(1)(a). Evolving regulatory regimes Historically, geography determined a consumer’s electricity provider.”
in Re Reliability Plans of Elec. Utils. for 2017-2021 (Mich. 2020). “6 with MCL 460.10g(1)(a). Evolving regulatory regimes Historically, geography determined a consumer’s electricity provider.”
in Re Application of Indiana Michigan Power Co to Increase Rates (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “Although some consumers in this state have the option of obtaining electricity from an AES, petitioner remains obligated to make available its transmission and distribution facilities for that purpose, and also retains a role in ensuring that AESs have sufficient capacity to…”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 460.10g(1)(f): 1 case
Attorney Gen. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 713 N.W.2d 290 (Mich. Ct. App. 2006). “” MCL 460.10g(1)(f). 2 We note that the PSC argues on appeal that, because appellant did not challenge the PSC’s directive that CEC implement a new renewable resources program in its appeal of the May 18, 2004, order (Docket No.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 460.10g(a): 1 case
in Re Implementing SEC 6w of 2016 Pa 341 for Cloverland Elec Coop (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “” MCL 460.10g(a). -1- appeal, Cloverland challenges the PSC’s decision to require the implementation of the SRM charge.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.