Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 460.352 (2026)
Suit to review order; time.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
REHEARINGS BY PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
Act 94 of 1923
460.352 Suit to review order; time.
Sec. 2.
The time allowed by law for the bringing of suit to review any order of the commission, shall continue after the order denying a rehearing or made upon a rehearing, for the same number of days now provided by law for review of the order upon which such rehearing was denied or had.
History: 1923, Act 94, Eff. Aug. 30, 1923 ;-- CL 1929, 11082 ;-- CL 1948, 460.352
Compiler's Notes:
For transfer of functions relating to the regulation of common carrier railroads from the Public Service Commission to the Department of Transportation, see E.R.O. No. 1982-3, compiled at MCL 247.823 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1985–1988 · leading case: Attorney Gen. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 394 N.W.2d 35 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986).
Attorney Gen. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 394 N.W.2d 35 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986). “The procedure for bringing a suit for judicial review of a psc order after denial of rehearing is set forth in MCL 460.352; MSA 22.112, which provides: The time allowed by law for the bringing of suit to review any order of the commission, shall con *430 tinue after the order…”
Great Lakes Steel Div. of Nat'l Steel Corp. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 373 N.W.2d 212 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). “111 authorizes the commission to grant rehearings and MCL 460.352; MSA 22.112 contemplates the time limits for initiating statutory review after the motion for rehearing is made.”
Attorney Gen. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 432 N.W.2d 437 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988). “MCL 460.352; MSA 22.112, Attorney General v Public Service Comm, supra, 429 Mich 248.”
Attorney Gen. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 414 N.W.2d 687 (Mich. 1987). “[MCL 460.352; MSA 22.112.] 4 One order authorized intervening defendant Southeastern Michigan Gas Company to adopt a cost recovery clause.”
Atty. Gen. v. Psc, 432 N.W.2d 437 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988). “MCL 460.352; MSA 22.112, Attorney General v Public Service Comm, supra, 429 Mich 248 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.