Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 484.2304a (2026)

Repealed. 2005, Act 235, Imd. Eff. Nov. 22, 2005.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT


Act 179 of 1991


484.2304a Repealed. 2005, Act 235, Imd. Eff. Nov. 22, 2005.

    Repealed. 2005, Act 235, Imd. Eff. Nov. 22, 2005.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed sections pertained to requirements for rate restructure and options for basic local exchange, toll, and access services.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2000–2004 · leading case: In Re Michigan Cable Telecomm. Ass'n Complaint, 609 N.W.2d 854 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000).
In Re Michigan Cable Telecomm. Ass'n Complaint, 609 N.W.2d 854 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “Subsection 304a(l), MCL 484.2304a(l); MSA 22.1469(304a)(l), provides that “[u]pon filing with and the approval of the commission, a basic local exchange provider shall restructure its rates for basic local exchange, toll, and access services to ensure that the rates are not less…”
Verizon North, Inc v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 677 N.W.2d 918 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 7× “MCL 484.2304a(2). Further, the provider of any regulated telecommunications service “shall not charge a rate for the service that is less than the [TSLRIC] of providing the service.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 484.2304a(2): 1 case
Verizon North, Inc v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 677 N.W.2d 918 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004). “MCL 484.2304a(2). Further, the provider of any regulated telecommunications service “shall not charge a rate for the service that is less than the [TSLRIC] of providing the service.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 484.2304a(l): 1 case
In Re Michigan Cable Telecomm. Ass'n Complaint, 609 N.W.2d 854 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “Subsection 304a(l), MCL 484.2304a(l); MSA 22.1469(304a)(l), provides that “[u]pon filing with and the approval of the commission, a basic local exchange provider shall restructure its rates for basic local exchange, toll, and access services to ensure that the rates are not less…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.