Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 49.35 (2026)
Assistant prosecuting attorneys, investigators and clerical employees; tenure.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
ASSISTANTS, CLERKS, AND INVESTIGATORS
Act 329 of 1925
49.35 Assistant prosecuting attorneys, investigators and clerical employees; tenure.
Sec. 5.
Said assistant prosecuting attorneys and other employees appointed by said prosecuting attorney under this act shall hold office during the pleasure of the prosecuting attorney.
History: 1925, Act 329, Eff. Aug. 27, 1925 ;-- CL 1929, 1301 ;-- CL 1948, 49.35
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: Hughson v. Cnty. of Antrim, 707 F. Supp. 304 (W.D. Mich. 1988).
Hughson v. Cnty. of Antrim, 707 F. Supp. 304 (W.D. Mich. 1988). “§ 49.35 provides: Said assistant prosecuting attorneys and other employees appointed by said prosecuting attorney under this act shall hold office during the pleasure of the prosecuting attorney.”
Feick v. Monroe Cnty., 582 N.W.2d 207 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “See MCL 49.35; MSA 5.795, which provides that “assistant prosecuting attorneys and other employees appointed by said prosecuting attorney under this act shall hold office during the pleasure of the prosecuting attorney.”
Monks v. Marlinga, 732 F. Supp. 749 (E.D. Mich. 1990). “Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. § 49.33. Additionally, [s]aid assistant prosecuting attorneys and other employees appointed by said prosecuting attorney under this act shall hold office during the pleasure of the prosecuting attorney.”
Genesee Cnty. Soc. Servs. Workers Union v. Genesee Cnty., 502 N.W.2d 701 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993). “] In support of his statutory authority to revoke employment at his pleasure, the prosecutor relied upon § 5 of the act, MCL 49.35; MSA 5.795: Said assistant prosecuting attorneys and other employees appointed by said prosecuting attorney under this act shall hold office during…”
Beth Bauer v. Cnty. of Saginaw (Mich. Ct. App. 2020). “31 and MCL 49.35 of the prosecutors’ appointment/tenure statute, MCL 49.”
MacOmb Cnty. Prosecutor v. MacOmb Cnty. Exec. (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “31 and MCL 49.35, Lucido asserted that he could “insist” that the HRLR reclassify Burke because this employment decision was solely Lucido’s decision to make.”
Beth Bauer v. Cnty. of Saginaw (Mich. Ct. App. 2020). “, enacted in 1976, broadly protects the right of public-sector employees to engage in political activity without fear of retribution.”
Jennifer Janetsky v. Cnty. of Saginaw (Mich. 2025). “In coming to this conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on the independence of county prosecutors under Const 1963, art 7, § 4, and MCL 49.35, among other statutes, in concert with the “economic-reality test.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.