Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 550 / Act 350 of 1980
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 550.1512 (2026)

Extension of 6-month period provided in MCL 550.511(1); determination.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE NONPROFIT HEALTH CARE CORPORATION REFORM ACT


Act 350 of 1980


550.1512 Extension of 6-month period provided in MCL 550.511(1); determination.

Sec. 512.

    The commissioner may extend the 6-month period provided in section 511(1) once, for not more than 90 days, if the commissioner determines that a health care corporation requires additional time to assess the findings made by the commissioner or to prepare a provider class plan that substantially achieves the goals, achieves the objectives, and substantially overcomes the deficiencies enumerated in the findings. In making a determination under this section, the commissioner shall consider the number of provider class plans, the extent of the changes to each plan, and the stage of development of each plan being prepared by the health care corporation pursuant to section 511(1).

History: 1980, Act 350, Eff. Apr. 3, 1981

PopularName Notes:

Blue Cross-Blue Shield

PopularName Notes:

Act 350
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1994–2001 · leading case: Genesis Ctr., PLC v. Comm'r of Fin. & Ins. Servs., 633 N.W.2d 834 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Genesis Ctr., PLC v. Comm'r of Fin. & Ins. Servs., 633 N.W.2d 834 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001). “6 A one-time extension of ninety days may be granted by the commissioner pursuant to MCL 550.1512. 7 We note that plaintiffs’ request for a remand to the circuit court for a determination pertaining to the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims regarding bcbsm’s alleged misconduct is…”
In re 1987-88 Med. Doctor Provider Class Plan, 514 N.W.2d 471 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994). “In § 515 the Legislature established a clear differentiation in the relief available, depending on the action or determination appealed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.