Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 560.223 (2026)
Complaint; contents.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
LAND DIVISION ACT
Act 288 of 1967
560.223 Complaint; contents.
Sec. 223.
The complaint shall set forth:
(a) The part or parts, if any, sought to be vacated and any other correction or revision of the plat sought by the plaintiff.
(b) The plaintiff's reasons for seeking the vacation, correction, or revision.
History: 1967, Act 288, Eff. Jan. 1, 1968 ;-- Am. 1978, Act 367, Imd. Eff. July 22, 1978
PopularName Notes:
Plat ActPopularName Notes:
Subdivision ControlNotes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1974–2025 · leading case: Beach v. Lima Twp., 802 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. 2011).
Beach v. Lima Twp., 802 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. 2011). “In addition, MCL 560.223 requires that the complaint set forth “[t]he part or parts, if any, sought to be vacated and any other correction or revision of the plat sought by the plaintiff” and “[t]he plaintiff’s reasons for seeking the vacation, correction, or revision.”
2000 Baum Fam. Trust v. Babel, 793 N.W.2d 633 (Mich. 2010). “226(2); MCL 560.227a(1); see also MCL 224.18(5) and (8).”
Martin v. Beldean, 677 N.W.2d 312 (Mich. 2004). “23 MCL 560.223 provides: The complaint shall set forth: (a) The part or parts, if any, sought to be vacated and any other correction or revision of the plat sought by the plaintiff.”
Beach v. Lima Twp., 770 N.W.2d 386 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “” MCL 560.223(a) and (b). MCL 560.224a identifies all the individuals and entities that a plaintiff must join as party defendants in an LDA action.”
Vivian v. Roscommon Cnty. Bd. of Road Commissioners, 416 N.W.2d 394 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). “The state appeals only the vacation of Michigan Central Park Boulevard, whereas the county appeals the vacation of all three roads.”
Bd. of Educ. v. Michigan Bell Tel. Co., 215 N.W.2d 704 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974). “” (Now MCLA 560.223; MSA 26.430[223].) 2. MCLA 560.”
Gimmy G Tress v. Roscommon Cnty. Road Comm'n (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “” However, without a judicial decree showing that plaintiffs validly obtained record title to the property, there is no legal or record basis for plaintiffs to seek a vacation, correction, or revision of the plat.”
Gimmy G Tress v. Roscommon Cnty. Road Comm'n (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “” However, without a judicial decree showing that plaintiffs validly obtained record title to the property, there is no legal or record basis for plaintiffs to seek a vacation, correction, or revision of the plat.”
G&D Inv. Grp. LLC v. Cedar Bluff Preserve LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “The complaint must set forth the following: (1) “[t]he part or parts, if any, sought to be vacated and any other correction or revision of the plat sought by the plaintiff;” and (2) “[t]he plaintiff’s reasons for seeking the vacation, correction, or revision.”
David Campbell v. Fenton Twp. (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “-2- the subdivision covered by the plat is located.” MCL 560.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 560.223(a) — 1 case
Beach v. Lima Twp., 770 N.W.2d 386 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “” MCL 560.223(a) and (b). MCL 560.224a identifies all the individuals and entities that a plaintiff must join as party defendants in an LDA action.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 560.223(b) — 4 cases
Beach v. Lima Twp., 802 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. 2011). “In addition, MCL 560.223 requires that the complaint set forth “[t]he part or parts, if any, sought to be vacated and any other correction or revision of the plat sought by the plaintiff” and “[t]he plaintiff’s reasons for seeking the vacation, correction, or revision.”
Vivian v. Roscommon Cnty. Bd. of Road Commissioners, 416 N.W.2d 394 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). “The state appeals only the vacation of Michigan Central Park Boulevard, whereas the county appeals the vacation of all three roads.”
Gimmy G Tress v. Roscommon Cnty. Road Comm'n (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “” However, without a judicial decree showing that plaintiffs validly obtained record title to the property, there is no legal or record basis for plaintiffs to seek a vacation, correction, or revision of the plat.”
Gimmy G Tress v. Roscommon Cnty. Road Comm'n (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “” However, without a judicial decree showing that plaintiffs validly obtained record title to the property, there is no legal or record basis for plaintiffs to seek a vacation, correction, or revision of the plat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.