Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 567.224a (2026)

Exception.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM UNCLAIMED PROPERTY ACT


Act 29 of 1995


567.224a Exception.

Sec. 4a.

    (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), property is not subject to the custody of this state as unclaimed property if its value is $25.00 or less.

    (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to property described in section 11a or dividends.

History: Add. 2015, Act 242, Imd. Eff. Dec. 22, 2015

Compiler's Notes:

    Enacting section 1 of Act 242 of 2015 provides:

    "Enacting section 1. This amendatory act is retroactive and applies to audits in progress as of August 15, 2015, but does not retroactively apply to contested determinations in litigation before the date of enactment of this amendatory act."

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2024–2025 · leading case: The Walt Disney Co. v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. 2025).
The Walt Disney Co. v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. 2025). · cites it 2× “See MCL 567.224a to MCL 567.237a. For example, unclaimed wages worth more than $50 are presumed abandoned after one year rather than after three years.”
Dine Brands Global Inc v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. 2025). · cites it 2× “See MCL 567.224a to MCL 567.237a. For example, unclaimed wages worth more than $50 are presumed abandoned after one year rather than after three years.”
Lisa Kemerer v. State of Michigan (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “” MCL 567.224a(1). -8- preceded by a single publication of notice, at least 3 weeks in advance of sale, in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the property is to be sold.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 567.224a(1): 1 case
Lisa Kemerer v. State of Michigan (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “” MCL 567.224a(1). -8- preceded by a single publication of notice, at least 3 weeks in advance of sale, in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the property is to be sold.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.