Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 6 / Act 62 of 1872
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.6 (2026)

Impeachment; counsel for accused.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

IMPEACHMENTS


Act 62 of 1872


6.6 Impeachment; counsel for accused.

Sec. 6.

    The person accused shall be allowed counsel on the trial of the impeachment.

History: 1872, Act 62, Imd. Eff. Mar. 30, 1872 ;-- How. 55 ;-- CL 1897, 23 ;-- CL 1915, 37 ;-- CL 1929, 64 ;-- CL 1948, 6.6

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1953–2025 · leading case: Mettler Walloon, LLC v. Melrose Twp., 761 N.W.2d 293 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mettler Walloon, LLC v. Melrose Twp., 761 N.W.2d 293 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “” Melrose Township Zoning Ordinance (MTZO), art § 6.6(A). Numerous uses are permitted in the village commercial zone, including boathouses and wet storage, dry boat storage, marinas, and “[a]partments above all of the allowed uses[.”
Schadewald v. Brule, 570 N.W.2d 788 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “” Section 6.6 of the township’s zoning ordinance requires a written record of the proceedings of each hearing before the board that must include “a summary of the proceedings, findings of fact, conclusions and the formal determination.”
Chapdelaine v. Sochocki, 635 N.W.2d 339 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001). “See 1 Cameron, Michigan Real Property Law (2d ed), § 6.6, p 194. To create an express grant or reservation of an easement, there must be language in the instrument of conveyance manifesting a clear intent to create the easement.”
People v. Hill, 415 N.W.2d 193 (Mich. 1987). · cites it 2× “, 1 LaFave & Israel, Criminal Procedure, § 6.6(d)-(f), pp 494-499. [1] "[T]he only relevant inquiry is how a reasonable man in the suspect's position would have understood his situation.”
Flynn v Korneffel, 547 N.W.2d 249 (Mich. 1996). · cites it 3× “8 supra, § 6.6, pp. 6-5 to 6-6; Powell, n. 1 supra, ¶ 938.”
People v. Davis, 497 N.W.2d 910 (Mich. 1993). “2 LaFave, Search & Seizure, § 6.6(a), p 698. Specifically, there must be evidence that would lead a prudent and reasonable official to see a need to act.”
In Re Dow Corning Corp., 244 B.R. 705 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999). · cites it 2× “Amended Joint Disclosure Statement With Respect to Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization (“Disclosure Statement”) § 6.6(G)(4); Settlement Facility Agreement § 3.”
In Re Dow Corning Corp., 244 B.R. 634 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999). · cites it 2× “Disclosure Statement § 6.6(G)(4). Objections to claim classification are discussed in Part II of this opinion.”
Joerger v. Gordon Food Serv., Inc, 568 N.W.2d 365 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). “Damages awarded in promissory estoppel actions may include an award of lost profits, Calamari & Perillo, The Law of Contracts (3d ed), § 6.6, p 291, and out-of-pocket expenses incurred in preparation for performance or in the performing of the work that was induced by the…”
Dearborn Twp. Clerk v. Jones, 57 N.W.2d 40 (Mich. 1953). “6 [Stat Ann § 6.6]), is an election held for' the purpose of deciding by ballot who shall be the nominees of political parties for the offices named in part 3 of the act.”
Canton Twp. v. Wayne Cnty. Road Comm'n, 367 N.W.2d 385 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). “After the road commission notified the townships that the dust program would be terminated, the Wayne County Department of Health began issuing violation notices to the townships for violations of Article VI, § 6.6 of the Wayne County Air Pollution Control Regulations.”
Michigan Ass'n of Admin. Law Judges v. Pers. Dir., 402 N.W.2d 19 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986). “Respondent Ross’ determination that the aljs belonged in the Business and Administrative unit was appealed to an arbitrator pursuant to the MCSC Employee Relations Policy § 6.6. The arbitrator found that the Business and Administrative *392 unit was the most appropriate unit for…”
Show all 20 citing cases →
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.6(A) — 1 case
Mettler Walloon, LLC v. Melrose Twp., 761 N.W.2d 293 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “” Melrose Township Zoning Ordinance (MTZO), art § 6.6(A). Numerous uses are permitted in the village commercial zone, including boathouses and wet storage, dry boat storage, marinas, and “[a]partments above all of the allowed uses[.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.6(B) — 1 case
Mettler Walloon, LLC v. Melrose Twp., 761 N.W.2d 293 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “” Melrose Township Zoning Ordinance (MTZO), art § 6.6(A). Numerous uses are permitted in the village commercial zone, including boathouses and wet storage, dry boat storage, marinas, and “[a]partments above all of the allowed uses[.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.6(G)(4) — 2 cases
In Re Dow Corning Corp., 244 B.R. 705 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999). “Amended Joint Disclosure Statement With Respect to Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization (“Disclosure Statement”) § 6.6(G)(4); Settlement Facility Agreement § 3.”
In Re Dow Corning Corp., 244 B.R. 634 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999). “Disclosure Statement § 6.6(G)(4). Objections to claim classification are discussed in Part II of this opinion.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.6(J)(2)(b) — 1 case
In Re Dow Corning Corp., 244 B.R. 634 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999). “Disclosure Statement § 6.6(G)(4). Objections to claim classification are discussed in Part II of this opinion.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.6(a) — 1 case
People v. Davis, 497 N.W.2d 910 (Mich. 1993). “2 LaFave, Search & Seizure, § 6.6(a), p 698. Specifically, there must be evidence that would lead a prudent and reasonable official to see a need to act.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.6(d) — 1 case
People v. Hill, 415 N.W.2d 193 (Mich. 1987). “, 1 LaFave & Israel, Criminal Procedure, § 6.6(d)-(f), pp 494-499. [1] "[T]he only relevant inquiry is how a reasonable man in the suspect's position would have understood his situation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.