Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 6 / Act 62 of 1872
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.7 (2026)

Impeachment; trial, time, place, adjournment.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

IMPEACHMENTS


Act 62 of 1872


6.7 Impeachment; trial, time, place, adjournment.

Sec. 7.

    When issue shall be joined in an impeachment, the senate, sitting as a court for the trial of the same shall appoint a time and place for the trial thereof. At the time and place so appointed, the senate, as a court, shall proceed to hear, try and determine the impeachment, and may from time to time, if necessary, adjourn the trial to any other time or place at the state capital.

History: 1872, Act 62, Imd. Eff. Mar. 30, 1872 ;-- How. 56 ;-- CL 1897, 24 ;-- CL 1915, 38 ;-- CL 1929, 65 ;-- CL 1948, 6.7

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1977–2025 · leading case: Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n, 473 N.W.2d 652 (Mich. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n, 473 N.W.2d 652 (Mich. 1991). · cites it 4× “To the extent that the statute's function is viewed as evidentiary, it is difficult to see why the statute should not be satisfied by a written admission in a pleading, stipulation, or deposition, even though it is in the same action in which the statute is raised as a defense.”
Foodland Distributors v. Al-Naimi, 559 N.W.2d 379 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “"Under the bad faith exception, a promise of future performance may constitute a misrepresentation where statements or conduct `at the very time of making the representations, or almost immediately thereafter' indicate that the party making the promise had no intention of…”
People v. White, 828 N.W.2d 329 (Mich. 2013). · cites it 2× “” [2 LaFave, Criminal Procedure (3d ed), § 6.7(a), p 757, quoting White, Interrogation Without Questions: Rhode Island v.”
Derderian v. Genesys Health Care Sys., 689 N.W.2d 145 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004). “, dissenting), citing Pappas & Steiger, Michigan Business Torts (ICLE, 1991), § 6.7, p 84. Plaintiffs assert that the record supports an inference that defendants did not intend to fulfill the promised terms of the agreement with plaintiffs, particularly the provision that…”
Soupal v. Shady View, Inc, 672 N.W.2d 171 (Mich. 2003). · cites it 2× “" Art VI, part A, § 6.7(d). [4] Unpublished opinion per curiam, issued February 28, 2003 (Docket No.”
Wiggins v. City of Burton, 805 N.W.2d 517 (Mich. Ct. App. 2011). “Jeffery v Lathrup, 363 Mich 15, 21-22 ; 108 NW2d 827 (1961); see also Kirchen v Remenga, 291 Mich 94, 108 ; 288 NW 344 (1939); 1 Cameron, Michigan Real Property Law (3d ed), § 6.7, p 220. The designation of an easement on a properly recorded plat “ha[s] all the force and effect…”
People v. Gray, 577 N.W.2d 92 (Mich. 1998). “” Sobel, § 6.7, p 6-32.1. Rather, the defendant was tentatively identified at the lineup.”
Tash v. Houston, 254 N.W.2d 579 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 2× “It can therefore be assumed that the employment relationship was terminable at will by either plaintiff or the local.”
In re Spiech Farms, LLC, 592 B.R. 152 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2018). “at §§ 6.7, 7.3). Produce Pay had one material obligation under the Agreement - to loan the Debtor money.”
In Re Iron Workers Local 25 Pension Fund, 811 F. Supp. 2d 1295 (E.D. Mich. 2011). “§ 6.7. 15. In the summer of 2003, the Joint Board consisted of the following members: Union Trustees Patrick Gleason (Chairman), James Hamric, and Art Ellul; and Employer Trustees James Edwards, D.”
Kings Lane Gp Inc v. Kings Lane Ltd Dividend Hous. Ass'n (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 4× “Section 6.7 of the Restated Partnership Agreement provides, in relevant part: 6.”
Open Stores in Keego Harbor Comm. v. City of Keego Harbor (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “Section 6.7 states that “[a]n ordinance may be initiated by petition, or a referendum on an ordinance enacted by the council may be had, by a petition, as hereinafter provided.”
Show all 18 citing cases →
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.7(A) — 1 case
Nat. Resources Manageent, LLC v. Parma, Twp. of (E.D. Mich. 2025).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.7(a) — 4 cases
People v. White, 828 N.W.2d 329 (Mich. 2013). “” [2 LaFave, Criminal Procedure (3d ed), § 6.7(a), p 757, quoting White, Interrogation Without Questions: Rhode Island v.”
People of Michigan v. Joshua Michael Bauman (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
People of Michigan v. Kadeem Dennis White (Mich. 2013).
People of Michigan v. Kadeem Dennis White (Mich. 2013).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.7(d) — 1 case
Soupal v. Shady View, Inc, 672 N.W.2d 171 (Mich. 2003). “" Art VI, part A, § 6.7(d). [4] Unpublished opinion per curiam, issued February 28, 2003 (Docket No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.