Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.1625 (2026)
Repealed. 1976, Act 375, Eff. Jan. 1, 1977.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961
Act 236 of 1961
600.1625 Repealed. 1976, Act 375, Eff. Jan. 1, 1977.
Repealed. 1976, Act 375, Eff. Jan. 1, 1977.
Compiler's Notes:
The repealed section defined “established” for purposes of all matters pertaining to venue.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1967–1990 · leading case: Saba v. Gray, 314 N.W.2d 597 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981).
Saba v. Gray, 314 N.W.2d 597 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “1621(a) should be interpreted in accordance with the term "doing business” as formerly used in MCL 600.1625; MSA 27A.1625. In the instant case, defendant testified that he was the owner of Perry Gray and Associates, located in Monroe County.”
DesJardin v. Lynn, 149 N.W.2d 228 (Mich. Ct. App. 1967). “Such, however, is the case in this interpretation of CLS 1961, § 600.1625 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 27A-.1625) which lies before us.”
Frees v. S. Michigan Cold Storage Co., 204 N.W.2d 782 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972). “” MCLA 600.1625(b); MSA 27A.1625(b) defines "established”: "Both domestic and foreign corporations are established in any county in which the corporation (i) has its principal place of business, (ii) has its registered office, (iii) has a place of business if a plaintiff is…”
Chiarini v. John Deere Co., 458 N.W.2d 668 (Mich. Ct. App. 1990). “The phrase "conducts business” should be interpreted in accordance with the phrase "doing business” as formerly used in MCL 600.1625; MSA 27A.1625. Saba v Gray, 111 Mich App 304, 313 ; 314 NW2d 597 (1981).”
Nat'l Bank of Rochester v. Meadowbrook Hgts., Inc., 265 N.W.2d 43 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). “1621, 3 MCLA 600.1625(b)(iv); MSA 27A.1625(b)(iv), 4 MCLA 600.”
Michigan Bell Tel. Co. v. Aid-U Secretarial Bureau, Inc., 151 N.W.2d 234 (Mich. Ct. App. 1967). “1621) 1 and CLS 1961, § 600.1625 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 27A.1625) 2 when both plaintiff and defendant corporations have their principal place of business and registered office in Wayne county and both do business in Oakland county? In order for a domestic or foreign corporation to…”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.1625(b): 2 cases
Saba v. Gray, 314 N.W.2d 597 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “1621(a) should be interpreted in accordance with the term "doing business” as formerly used in MCL 600.1625; MSA 27A.1625. In the instant case, defendant testified that he was the owner of Perry Gray and Associates, located in Monroe County.”
Frees v. S. Michigan Cold Storage Co., 204 N.W.2d 782 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972). “” MCLA 600.1625(b); MSA 27A.1625(b) defines "established”: "Both domestic and foreign corporations are established in any county in which the corporation (i) has its principal place of business, (ii) has its registered office, (iii) has a place of business if a plaintiff is…”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.1625(b)(iv): 1 case
Nat'l Bank of Rochester v. Meadowbrook Hgts., Inc., 265 N.W.2d 43 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). “1621, 3 MCLA 600.1625(b)(iv); MSA 27A.1625(b)(iv), 4 MCLA 600.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.