Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2415 (2026)

Costs; liability of next of friend or guardian.

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Aug. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961


Act 236 of 1961


600.2415 Costs; liability of next of friend or guardian.

Sec. 2415.

    Any person who brings an action as next of friend for an infant, or a person who is insane or otherwise mentally incompetent, shall be responsible for the costs of the suit. However, no person who defends a suit as guardian ad litem of an infant or otherwise incompetent person shall be responsible for the costs of the suit unless specifically charged by the court for some personal misconduct in the case.

History: 1961, Act 236, Eff. Jan. 1, 1963

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2004–2025 · leading case: Doe v. Boyle, 877 N.W.2d 918 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
Doe v. Boyle, 877 N.W.2d 918 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 6× “MCL 600.2415 provides: Any person who brings an action as next of friend for an infant, or a person who is insane or otherwise mentally incompetent, shall be responsible for the costs of the suit.”
Ryan v. Ryan, 677 N.W.2d 899 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “] See also MCL 600.2415. Because plaintiff was a plaintiff, not a defendant, appointment of a guardian ad litem was improper.”
M.M. v. State of Alaska, 462 P.3d 539 (Alaska 2020). “”); Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2415 (2019) (“Any person who brings an action as next of friend .”
Lockett v. LVNV Funding LLC, No. 2:24-cv-12165 (E.D. Mich. June 20, 2025). · cites it 2× “” Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 600.2415 (West 2010).”
Kyle J Bowles v. Renee Repkie, No. 365223 (Mich. Ct. App. Apr. 18, 2025). “She also contends that costs against BB were not allowable because MCL 600.2415 states: Any person who brings an action as next of friend for an infant, or a person who is insane or otherwise mentally incompetent, shall be responsible for the costs of the suit.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.