Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 600 / Act 236 of 1961
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.6134 (2026)

Fraudulent transfers.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961


Act 236 of 1961


600.6134 Fraudulent transfers.

Sec. 6134.

    For the purposes of this chapter a person is deemed to be indebted to the judgment debtor, although any debt in question has been assigned, charged or encumbered by the judgment debtor, if the assignment, charge or encumbrance is fraudulent as against creditors or is otherwise voidable.

History: 1961, Act 236, Eff. Jan. 1, 1963

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: John Mighion LLC v. Mht Fam. Props. I LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2025).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
John Mighion LLC v. Mht Fam. Props. I LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 3× “621(A) and MCL 600.6134.” Directly below the title the complaint states, “This is a business case in which all or part of action [sic] includes a business or commercial dispute under MCL 600.”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Max Rehab Physical Therapy, LLC, Maximum Rehab Physical Therapy, LLC, Joseph Labib, & Renee Labib (E.D. Mich. 2026). · cites it 2× “” Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.6134 . Michigan law further provides that voidable transfers include those that were made: (1) “[w]ith the actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud any creditor of the debtor[,]” see id.”
Fred St Onge v. State of Michigan (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs, Fred St. Onge and Karen Ross, were injured in an accident with a state-owned vehicle in 2011.”
Bott v. Four Star Corp., 150 F.R.D. 95 (E.D. Mich. 1993). “§ 600.6134 provides: For the purposes of this chapter a person is deemed to be indebted to the judgment debtor, although any debt in question has been assigned, charged or encumbered by the judgment debtor, if the assignment, charge or encumbrance is fraudulent as against…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.