Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 691.1733 (2026)

Operator; duties.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TRAMPOLINE COURT SAFETY ACT


Act 11 of 2014


691.1733 Operator; duties.

Sec. 3.

    An operator shall do all of the following:

    (a) Post the duties of trampoliners and spectators as prescribed in this act and the duties, obligations, and liabilities of operators as prescribed in this act in conspicuous places.

    (b) Comply with the safety standards specified in ASTM F2970 – 13, "Standard Practice for Design, Manufacture, Installation, Operation, Maintenance, Inspection and Major Modification of Trampoline Courts" published in 2013 by the American society for testing and materials.

    (c) Maintain the trampoline court according to the safety standards cited in subdivision (b).

    (d) Maintain the stability and legibility of all required signs, symbols, and posted notices.

History: 2014, Act 11, Imd. Eff. Feb. 18, 2014

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2021–2026 · leading case: Joshua Ray Cavins v. Bat Com. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2024).
Raphaela Allen v. Spring Loaded I LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “Under MCL 691.1733(b), a trampoline court operator shall “[c]omply with the safety standards specified in [American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)] F2970-13, ‘Standard Practice for Design, Manufacture, Installation, Operation, Maintenance, Inspection and Major…”
Joshua Ray Cavins v. Bat Com. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “The former of these theories asserted that Michigan Airtime failed to comply with the TCSA, MCL 691.1733, which imposes the following duties on the operator of a trampoline court: An operator shall do all of the following: (a) Post the duties of trampoliners and spectators as…”
Scott Redmond v. Spring Loaded I LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “Under MCL 691.1733(b), a trampoline court operator shall “[c]omply with the safety standards specified in ASTM[3] F2970-13, ‘Standard Practice for Design, Manufacture, Installation, Operation, Maintenance, Inspection and Major Modification of Trampoline Courts’ published in 2013…”
C Raphaela Allen v. Spring Loaded I LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “Because plaintiff has alleged improper design or maintenance, I would not hold that her claim is necessarily barred by the Trampoline Court Safety Act.”
Nicholas Noble v. Friends & Fam. Funland LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2026). “, 1 By comparison, MCL 691.1733(b) adopts certain ASTM standards into Michigan law for trampoline court operators.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 691.1733(b) — 5 cases
Raphaela Allen v. Spring Loaded I LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “Under MCL 691.1733(b), a trampoline court operator shall “[c]omply with the safety standards specified in [American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)] F2970-13, ‘Standard Practice for Design, Manufacture, Installation, Operation, Maintenance, Inspection and Major…”
Scott Redmond v. Spring Loaded I LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “Under MCL 691.1733(b), a trampoline court operator shall “[c]omply with the safety standards specified in ASTM[3] F2970-13, ‘Standard Practice for Design, Manufacture, Installation, Operation, Maintenance, Inspection and Major Modification of Trampoline Courts’ published in 2013…”
C Raphaela Allen v. Spring Loaded I LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “Because plaintiff has alleged improper design or maintenance, I would not hold that her claim is necessarily barred by the Trampoline Court Safety Act.”
Joshua Ray Cavins v. Bat Com. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “The former of these theories asserted that Michigan Airtime failed to comply with the TCSA, MCL 691.1733, which imposes the following duties on the operator of a trampoline court: An operator shall do all of the following: (a) Post the duties of trampoliners and spectators as…”
Nicholas Noble v. Friends & Fam. Funland LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2026). “, 1 By comparison, MCL 691.1733(b) adopts certain ASTM standards into Michigan law for trampoline court operators.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.