Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 722 / Act 195 of 2001
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.1108 (2026)

Notice; manner; proof of service; notice not required.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM CHILD-CUSTODY JURISDICTION AND ENFORCEMENT ACT


Act 195 of 2001


722.1108 Notice; manner; proof of service; notice not required.

Sec. 108.

    (1) Notice required for the exercise of jurisdiction when a person is outside this state may be given in a manner prescribed by the law of this state for service of process or by the law of the state in which the service is made. Notice must be given in a manner reasonably calculated to give actual notice, but may be by publication if other means are not effective.

    (2) Proof of service may be made in the manner prescribed by the law of this state or by the law of the state in which the service is made.

    (3) Notice is not required for the exercise of jurisdiction with respect to a person who submits to the jurisdiction of the court.

History: 2001, Act 195, Eff. Apr. 1, 2002

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2018–2023 · leading case: Subrhamanyam Raju Nadimpali v. Padma Byrraju, 931 N.W.2d 38 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Subrhamanyam Raju Nadimpali v. Padma Byrraju, 931 N.W.2d 38 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “(c) The person contesting registration was entitled to notice in the proceedings before the court that issued the child-custody determination for which registration is sought, but notice of those proceedings was not given in accordance with the standards of [ MCL 722.1108 ]. […”
Cornelia S Lorenz v. Benjamin Lorenz (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 5× “-2- registration is sought, but notice of those proceedings was not given in accordance with the standards of [MCL 722.1108] of the UCCJEA. The trial court held a hearing on Benjamin’s objection, and the parties’ attorneys vigorously disputed whether Benjamin received proper…”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.1108(1): 1 case
Cornelia S Lorenz v. Benjamin Lorenz (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “-2- registration is sought, but notice of those proceedings was not given in accordance with the standards of [MCL 722.1108] of the UCCJEA. The trial court held a hearing on Benjamin’s objection, and the parties’ attorneys vigorously disputed whether Benjamin received proper…”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.1108(3): 1 case
Cornelia S Lorenz v. Benjamin Lorenz (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “-2- registration is sought, but notice of those proceedings was not given in accordance with the standards of [MCL 722.1108] of the UCCJEA. The trial court held a hearing on Benjamin’s objection, and the parties’ attorneys vigorously disputed whether Benjamin received proper…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.