Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.315 (2026)

Losing at gambling.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE


Act 328 of 1931


750.315 Losing at gambling.

Sec. 315.

    Losing at gambling—Any person who shall lose any sum of money, or any goods, article or thing of value, by playing or betting on cards, dice or by any other device in the nature of such playing or betting, and shall pay or deliver the same or any part thereof to the winner, and shall not, within 3 months after such loss, without covin or collusion, prosecute with effect for such money or goods, the winner to whom such money or goods shall have been so paid or delivered, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine not exceeding 3 times the value of such money or goods. Such loser may sue for and recover such money in an action for money had and received to the use of the plaintiff; and such goods, article or valuable thing in an action of replevin, or the value thereof in an action on the case.

History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931 ;-- CL 1948, 750.315

FormerLaw Notes:

    See sections 9 and 10 of Ch. 43 of R.S. 1846, being CL 1857, §§ 1582 and 1583; CL 1871, §§ 1992 and 1993; How., §§ 2023 and 2024; CL 1897, §§ 5929 and 5930; CL 1915, §§ 7795 and 7796; and CL 1929, §§ 9111 and 9112.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2019–2019 · leading case: People of Michigan v. Treshaun Lee Terrance (Mich. Ct. App. 2019).
People of Michigan v. Treshaun Lee Terrance (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “317. The jury acquitted defendant of the first- and second-degree murder charges but was unable to reach a verdict with respect to the felony-murder charge.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.315(1)(b): 1 case
People of Michigan v. Treshaun Lee Terrance (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “317. The jury acquitted defendant of the first- and second-degree murder charges but was unable to reach a verdict with respect to the felony-murder charge.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.