Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 8 / R.S. of 1846
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 8.1 (2026)

Original acts; custody.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Revised Statutes of 1846


R.S. of 1846


8.1 Original acts; custody.

Sec. 1.

    The original acts of the legislature shall be deposited with, and kept by, the secretary of state.

History: R.S. 1846, Ch. 1 ;-- Am. 1847, Act 46, Imd. Eff. Mar. 15, 1847 ;-- CL 1857, 1 ;-- CL 1871, 1 ;-- How. 1 ;-- CL 1897, 49 ;-- CL 1915, 63 ;-- CL 1929, 75 ;-- CL 1948, 8.1

Compiler's Notes:

    Section 2 of R.S. 1846, Ch. 1, pertains to effective date of statutes. For present law on this subject, see Mich. Const., Art. 4, § 27.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35 cases (15 in the last 5 years), 1954–2026 · leading case: In Re Ford Motor Co. ERISA Litig., 590 F. Supp. 2d 883 (E.D. Mich. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Ford Motor Co. ERISA Litig., 590 F. Supp. 2d 883 (E.D. Mich. 2008). · cites it 8× “A, Article VIII, § 8.1(a), Ford-ER00722 (“2004 SSIP Plan Document”)).”
Jackson Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 1306 v. City of Jackson, 575 N.W.2d 823 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 13× “For reasons that will be stated, we hold that despite an arbitration panel’s prior contrary ruling, the MERC properly decided that § 8.1 of the parties’ July 1, 1988, to June 30, 1991, collective bargaining agreement did not constitute a mandatory bargaining subject.”
Square Lake Hills Condo. Ass'n v. Bloomfield Twp., 471 N.W.2d 321 (Mich. 1991). · cites it 4× “Section 8.1. Provision of this Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days from the date of publication in accordance with the Statutes of the State of Michigan.”
Oak Park Pub. Saf. Officers Ass'n v. City of Oak Park, 745 N.W.2d 527 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “The collective bargaining agreement effective from July 1, 1997, through June 30, 2001, contained minimum staffing provisions, including (1) a minimum number of PSOs per platoon (§ 8.1 C), (2) a minimum number of PSOs per shift (§ 8.”
Gregory v. Cincinnati Inc., 538 N.W.2d 325 (Mich. 1995). · cites it 2× “" 1 Madden, Products Liability (2d ed), § 8.1, p 290. In this context, the manufacturer's conduct is then tested for reasonableness.”
Bittinger v. Tecumseh Prods. Co., 83 F. Supp. 2d 851 (E.D. Mich. 1998). · cites it 4× “Notwithstanding the provisions of the Section 8.1, the Contract may be amended only in accordance with the provisions of such Contract.”
Donkers v. Kovach, 745 N.W.2d 154 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “" MCL 8.1 The Legislature clearly intended in Chapter 14 of the Revised Judicature Act to set up a distinction between oaths and affirmations and to treat the two as separate and distinct acts.”
In Re Dow Corning Corp., 244 B.R. 721 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999). · cites it 4× “However, an alternative construction is suggested by § 8.1, which provides that “any Claim [against the Debtor is discharged] .”
Dana Light Axle Mfg. LLC v. US Mfg. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 81× “5 of the UPA required that indemnification claims brought under §§ 8.1(a) and 8.2(a) be asserted within 18 months after the March 1, 2017 closing date.”
Detroit Terrazzo Contractors Ass'n v. Bd. of Trs. of the B.A.C. Local 32 Ins. Fund, 176 F. Supp. 2d 733 (E.D. Mich. 2001). · cites it 2× “Section 8.1 provides in part: Election of Trustees.”
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Winget, 901 F. Supp. 2d 955 (E.D. Mich. 2012). · cites it 2× “As a consequence of the Existing Defaults, among other things, (i) all indebtedness owed to the Lenders by the Borrower and all other obligations owed to the Lenders or the Administrative Agent under the Loan Documents are subject to acceleration pursuant to Section 8.1(a) of…”
Crosby v. Bowater Inc. Ret. Plan for Salaried Employees, 212 F.R.D. 350 (W.D. Mich. 2002). “” (Plan § 8.1.) This kind of system is much closer to the second kind of plan envisioned above than the first.”
Show all 35 citing cases →
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 8.1(A) — 1 case
Hall v. Stark Reagan, PC, 818 N.W.2d 367 (Mich. Ct. App. 2011).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 8.1(C) — 1 case
Oak Park Pub. Saf. Officers Ass'n v. City of Oak Park, 745 N.W.2d 527 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “The collective bargaining agreement effective from July 1, 1997, through June 30, 2001, contained minimum staffing provisions, including (1) a minimum number of PSOs per platoon (§ 8.1 C), (2) a minimum number of PSOs per shift (§ 8.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 8.1(a) — 3 cases
In Re Ford Motor Co. ERISA Litig., 590 F. Supp. 2d 883 (E.D. Mich. 2008). “A, Article VIII, § 8.1(a), Ford-ER00722 (“2004 SSIP Plan Document”)).”
Dana Light Axle Mfg. LLC v. US Mfg. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “5 of the UPA required that indemnification claims brought under §§ 8.1(a) and 8.2(a) be asserted within 18 months after the March 1, 2017 closing date.”
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Winget, 901 F. Supp. 2d 955 (E.D. Mich. 2012). “As a consequence of the Existing Defaults, among other things, (i) all indebtedness owed to the Lenders by the Borrower and all other obligations owed to the Lenders or the Administrative Agent under the Loan Documents are subject to acceleration pursuant to Section 8.1(a) of…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 8.1(b) — 1 case
Dana Light Axle Mfg. LLC v. US Mfg. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “5 of the UPA required that indemnification claims brought under §§ 8.1(a) and 8.2(a) be asserted within 18 months after the March 1, 2017 closing date.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 8.1(b)(i)(C) — 1 case
Dana Light Axle Mfg. LLC v. US Mfg. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “5 of the UPA required that indemnification claims brought under §§ 8.1(a) and 8.2(a) be asserted within 18 months after the March 1, 2017 closing date.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 8.1(c) — 1 case
People v. Powell, 502 N.W.2d 353 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.