Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 8.23 (2026)

Acts and joint resolutions; bound volumes as records, expenses.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PRESERVATION OF LAWS


Act 46 of 1847


8.23 Acts and joint resolutions; bound volumes as records, expenses.

Sec. 3.

    The acts and joint resolutions, when bound and certified, as specified in this act, shall be kept in the office of the secretary of state, and no further record thereof shall be required to be kept. The expenses of arranging and binding the laws, as specified in the preceding sections of this act, shall be paid by the treasurer of the state out of any moneys in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, on the certificate of the secretary of state.

History: 1847, Act 46, Imd. Eff. Mar. 15, 1847 ;-- CL 1857, 13 ;-- CL 1871, 13 ;-- How. 6 ;-- CL 1897, 54 ;-- CL 1915, 68 ;-- CL 1929, 80 ;-- CL 1948, 8.23

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1954–1982 · leading case: Reilly v. Marion Twp., 317 N.W.2d 693 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982).
Reilly v. Marion Twp., 317 N.W.2d 693 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 3× “” Section 8.23 of the ordinance lists the special exception uses permitted in the agricultural-residential district: "Special Exception Uses: "a.”
Michigan Gas Storage Co. v. Gregory, 67 N.W.2d 219 (Mich. 1954). “…213.82 et seq. [Stat Ann § 8.54 et seq.] ).—Reporter. 10 See section 13 et seq. (CL 1948, § 213.33 et seq. [Stat Ann § 8.23 'et-seg.]):—Reporter.”
Fish v. City of Dearborn, 88 N.W.2d 450 (Mich. 1958). · cites it 2× “” The most important section of the charter to be considered in this case is section 8.23, the pertinent portion of which originally provided: “Upon the recommendation of the corporation counsel, approved by the mayor, the council may retain special legal counsel to handle any…”
Bd. of Educ. v. Flanz, 116 N.W.2d 862 (Mich. 1962). “33 (Stat Ann 1958 Rev § 8.23). The court, further time not having been allowed within the 6-day period, was without jurisdiction to grant a new trial, except to prevent an obvious miscarriage of justice.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.