Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 105.47 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1977 c 162 s 8]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1973–1977 · leading case: United States v. Reserve Mining Co., 380 F. Supp. 11 (D. Minn. 1974).
United States v. Reserve Mining Co., 380 F. Supp. 11 (D. Minn. 1974). “) The relationship of the Courts to the permit issuing process is described in Minn.Stat. § 105.47: Except where otherwise prohibited, any party in interest may appeal from *76 any determination of the commissioner to the district court of the county in which the project is…”
State, Dep't of Conservation Ex Rel. Leirfallom v. Sheriff, 207 N.W.2d 358 (Minn. 1973). “If defendant wished to contest the finding of the commissioner that the filling which defendant proposed was detrimental to the public interest, the appropriate remedy was to appeal to the dis *180 trict court from the commissioner’s determination pursuant to § 105.47. No such…”
State, Dep't of Nat. Resources ex rel. Herbst v. Dist. Court, 208 N.W.2d 725 (Minn. 1973). “Section 105.47 provides for appeals by a party in interest from any determination of the commissioner.”
Citizens for a Better Hutchinson v. Minnesota Dep't of Nat. Resources, 255 N.W.2d 229 (Minn. 1977). “We do not perceive any possible prejudice to the plaintiff resulting from the trial court’s action in dismissing its first eight causes of action since it may raise all appropriate objections to the DNR action within the framework of its appeal pursuant to § 105.47. The order of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.