Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 106. DRAINAGE
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 106.671 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1985 c 172 s 133]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1971–1984 · leading case: Stevens v. State, by Head, 190 N.W.2d 482 (Minn. 1971).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stevens v. State, by Head, 190 N.W.2d 482 (Minn. 1971). · cites it 2× “n any case where a land or water area owned by the state and held or used for the purpose of protecting or propagating wild animals, providing hunting or fishing for the public, or for any other purpose relating to the conservation, development, or use of soil, water, forests,…”
Coon Creek Watershed Dist. v. State Env't Quality Bd., 315 N.W.2d 604 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 106.671 (1980). The District argues that requiring it to prepare an EIS will delay the necessary ditch repairs.”
Balbach v. Moe, 200 N.W.2d 901 (Minn. 1972). “§ 106.671. Because of the explicit statutory preference that the state’s interest should be protected in projects involving public waters, any ambiguity in the word “drain” in § 106.”
Heitzeg v. Town of Keister, 356 N.W.2d 423 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “It is for this reason, that changing or adding to any single drainage system can have widespread effects, that Minn.Stat. § 106.501 (and other sections in that chapter) provide for notice to other affected landowners before improvements may be undertaken.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.