Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 116C.65 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Renumbered 216E.15]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1978–1979 · leading case: People for Env't Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Env't Quality Council, 266 N.W.2d 858 (Minn. 1978).
People for Env't Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Env't Quality Council, 266 N.W.2d 858 (Minn. 1978). “MERA is clearly broader than the PPSA because MERA recognizes a right in each citizen to bring a civil suit, while under § 116C.65 of the PPSA, only a utility, a party, or a person aggrieved can appeal a decision of the MEQC to the district court.”
Floodwood-Fine Lakes Citizens Grp. v. Minnesota Env't Quality Council, 287 N.W.2d 390 (Minn. 1979). “Pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 116C.65 (1976) appeals were taken by Citizens, Great Lakes, and MPL to the District Court of St.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.