Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 122.06 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1957 c 947 art 9 s 9]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1956–1958 · leading case: Hubner v. Carson, 74 N.W.2d 419 (Minn. 1956).
Hubner v. Carson, 74 N.W.2d 419 (Minn. 1956). “” It is the contention of respondent, and apparently it was the opinion of the trial court when it amended its findings, that under § 122.”
In Re Merger of Certain Sch. Dists., Pipestone Cnty., 246 Minn. 110 (Minn. 1956). “" It is the contention of respondent, and apparently it was the opinion of the trial court when it amended its findings, that under § 122.”
Halvorsen v. Sch. Dist. No. 44, 91 N.W.2d 164 (Minn. 1958). “So far as a determination of this case is concerned we need only determine whether or not the requirements of § 122.06 were sufficiently complied with.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.