Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 122.52 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1953 [Repealed, 1957 c 947 art 9 s 9]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1951–1958 · leading case: State ex rel. Klitzke v. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 88, 61 N.W.2d 410 (Minn. 1953).
State ex rel. Klitzke v. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 88, 61 N.W.2d 410 (Minn. 1953). “666, amending § 122.52 by the addition of paragraph (3) thereof, approved April 25, 1949, was enacted to take care of the situation where an election has failed under the recommended reorganization plan.”
State Ex Rel. Sch. Dist. No. 56 v. Schmiesing, 66 N.W.2d 20 (Minn. 1954). “52, since no previous meeting under § 122.52 had been held in this added area.”
State Ex Rel. Helling v. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 160, 92 N.W.2d 70 (Minn. 1958). “It is the contention of relators that under § 122.52 the approval of the State Advisory Commission was essential to the holding of a valid third election.”
Bricelyn Sch. Dist. No. 132 v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 55 N.W.2d 597 (Minn. 1952). “” The reorganization act as originally passed did not expressly grant these essential ‘powers to the new type of school districts; but originally § 122.52 12 of the act incorporated by reference § 122.”
State Ex Rel. Huntley Sch. Dist. No. 4 JT. v. Schweickhard, 45 N.W.2d 657 (Minn. 1951). “§ 122.52. Whatever rights are established, they are established by the voters.”
Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 66 v. Big Stone Cnty., 67 N.W.2d 903 (Minn. 1954). “In the meantime, on December 16,1952, an election was held in Big Stone county under § 122.52 for the creation of Independent Consolidated School District No.”
Bricelyn Sch. Dist. No. 132 v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 55 N.W.2d 602 (Minn. 1952). “…of Steele, 181 Minn. 427, 431 , 232 N. W. 737, 738 , 71 A. L. R. 1190. L. 1949, c. 666, § 8, now M. S. A. 1949, § 122.52.”
Haugen v. Cnty. Commissioners, 52 N.W.2d 762 (Minn. 1952). “Section 122.52(4) provides: “If a majority of the votes cast be for reorganization, the county superintendent within ten days thereafter shall make proper orders to give effect to such vote and thereafter transmit a copy thereof to the auditor of each county in which any part of…”
Minn. Stat. § 122.52(1): 2 cases
State ex rel. Klitzke v. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 88, 61 N.W.2d 410 (Minn. 1953). “666, amending § 122.52 by the addition of paragraph (3) thereof, approved April 25, 1949, was enacted to take care of the situation where an election has failed under the recommended reorganization plan.”
Bricelyn Sch. Dist. No. 132 v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 55 N.W.2d 597 (Minn. 1952). “” The reorganization act as originally passed did not expressly grant these essential ‘powers to the new type of school districts; but originally § 122.52 12 of the act incorporated by reference § 122.”
Minn. Stat. § 122.52(3): 1 case
State ex rel. Klitzke v. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 88, 61 N.W.2d 410 (Minn. 1953). “666, amending § 122.52 by the addition of paragraph (3) thereof, approved April 25, 1949, was enacted to take care of the situation where an election has failed under the recommended reorganization plan.”
Minn. Stat. § 122.52(4): 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Sch. Dist. No. 56 v. Schmiesing, 66 N.W.2d 20 (Minn. 1954). “52, since no previous meeting under § 122.52 had been held in this added area.”
Haugen v. Cnty. Commissioners, 52 N.W.2d 762 (Minn. 1952). “Section 122.52(4) provides: “If a majority of the votes cast be for reorganization, the county superintendent within ten days thereafter shall make proper orders to give effect to such vote and thereafter transmit a copy thereof to the auditor of each county in which any part of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.