Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 15.0421 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Renumbered 14.61]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1977–1981 · leading case: Sterling Inv., Inc. v. State, Dep't of Com., Sec. Div., 278 N.W.2d 75 (Minn. 1979).
Sterling Inv., Inc. v. State, Dep't of Com., Sec. Div., 278 N.W.2d 75 (Minn. 1979). “It was certainly not an intentional thing not to respond but it just sat on someone’s desk or got in a file or something and we didn’t, and I offer no defense for it, it just happened.”
Mampel v. E. Heights State Bank of St. Paul, 254 N.W.2d 375 (Minn. 1977). “1974, § 15.0421, which reads as follows: “Whenever in a contested case a majority of the officials of the agency who are to render the final decision have not heard or read the evidence, the decision, if adverse to a party to the proceeding other than the agency itself, shall…”
People for Env't Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Env't Quality Council, 266 N.W.2d 858 (Minn. 1978). “0418 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires that all evidence submitted to him be certified to the agency, and § 15.0421 mandates that the parties to the proceedings get an opportunity to file exceptions and present arguments to the agency, and that the final…”
Flame Bar, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis, 295 N.W.2d 586 (Minn. 1980). “Similarly, § 15.0421 refers to the "report of the hearing examiner as required by section 15.”
O'Connor Bros. State Bank of Renville v. Dep't of Com., 304 N.W.2d 894 (Minn. 1981). “1974, § 15.0421, and whether any materials, communications or other information outside the record were relied upon in reaching the commission’s decision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.