Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 151.29 (2026)
Violation A Misdemeanor
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter, or rules hereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, unless otherwise provided.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1958–2014 · leading case: State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc., 92 N.W.2d 103 (Minn. 1958).
State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc., 92 N.W.2d 103 (Minn. 1958). “The trial court held that under § 151.29 [6] violation of the Pharmacy Act was a misdemeanor and that it was the duty of the city attorney of Minneapolis, pursuant to § 151.”
Aaron M. Deroo v. United States, 223 F.3d 919 (8th Cir. 2000). “…cannot be a predicate offense for the application of section 924(e)(1) because it is a misdemeanor in Minnesota. See Minn.Stat. § 151.29.”
Ciardelli v. Rindal, 582 N.W.2d 910 (Minn. 1998). “Minn.Stat. § 151.29 (1996). Consequently, the pharmacist telephoned Rindal who specifically authorized another refill of the Motrin prescription for Ciardelli.”
Graphic Commc'ns Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund \A\" (2014). “” Minn. Stat. § 151.29 . These express criminal and civil penalties demonstrate that the Legislature did not intend to provide an implied private civil cause of action against a pharmacist or pharmacy that violates Minn.”
Aaron M. Deroo v. United States (8th Cir. 2000). “See Minn. Stat. § 151.29 . -12- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.