Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 152.09 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1989 c 290 art 3 s 37]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 73
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1971–2024 · leading case: State v. Lewis, 394 N.W.2d 212 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986).
State v. Lewis, 394 N.W.2d 212 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “On appeal, he contends that mere presence of morphine within a person's body does not constitute “possession” within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 152.09 , subd. 1(2). We reverse.”
State v. Wiley, 366 N.W.2d 265 (Minn. 1985). “Appellant was found guilty of possession of a Schedule I controlled substance by the Hennepin County District Court, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 152.09, subd. 1(2) (1984). The prosecution arose out of the seizure at appellant's residence, pursuant to a search warrant, of two…”
State v. McIntosh, 641 N.W.2d 3 (Minn. 2002). “See Minn.Stat. § 152.09 (1980); State v. Walters, 315 N.”
State v. Reese, 446 N.W.2d 173 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). “FACTS On March 28, 1988, Michael Lavern Reese was charged in Albert Lea, Minnesota with possession of marijuana in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 152.09, subd. 1(2), 152.15, subd.”
State v. Moore, 431 N.W.2d 565 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). “02 is the statute which declares what substances are prohibited; Minn.Stat. § 152.09 describes what acts break the law; and Minn.”
In Re Welfare of C.R.M., 611 N.W.2d 802 (Minn. 2000). “Florine, we held that the defendant was guilty under Minn.Stat. § 152.09, subd. 1(2) (1974), of the felony offense of unlawful possession of cocaine, but noted "to convict a defendant of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, the state must prove that defendant…”
State v. Carithers, 490 N.W.2d 620 (Minn. 1992). “” Minn.Stat. § 152.09, subd. 1(1) (1986). All of these unlawful acts are applicable to transfers of controlled substances in the commercial distribution chain.”
State v. Gabbert, 411 N.W.2d 209 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “Gabbert was arrested and charged with possession of a controlled substance in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 152.09, subd. 1(2); 152.15, subd.”
State v. Munoz, 385 N.W.2d 373 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “Appellant was convicted under Minn. Stat. § 152.09 , which states: , [I]t shall be unlawful for any person * * * to [[Image here]] (2) Possess a controlled substance, except when the possession is for his own use and is authorized by law.”
State v. Goodrich, 256 N.W.2d 506 (Minn. 1977). “If any person is found guilty of a violation of section 152.09, subdivision 1, clause (2) [possession of a controlled substance] after trial or upon a plea of guilty, the court may, without entering a judgment of guilty and with the consent of such person, defer further…”
State v. Smith, 448 N.W.2d 550 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). “Appellant was charged at trial with possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute, Minn.Stat. § 152.09, subd. 1(1) (1988), possession of cocaine, Minn.”
State v. Marshall, 411 N.W.2d 276 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “Appellant James Marshall was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to sell, Minn.Stat. § 152.09, subd.' 1(1), with reference to Minn.”
— Minn. Stat. § 152.09(1)(2) — 1 case
State v. Zimmerman, 352 N.W.2d 452 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.