Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 152.09 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1989 c 290 art 3 s 37]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 73 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1971–2024 · leading case: State v. Lewis, 394 N.W.2d 212 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986).
State v. Lewis, 394 N.W.2d 212 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 18× “On appeal, he contends that mere presence of morphine within a person's body does not constitute “possession” within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 152.09 , subd. 1(2). We reverse.”
State v. Wiley, 366 N.W.2d 265 (Minn. 1985). · cites it 4× “Appellant was found guilty of possession of a Schedule I controlled substance by the Hennepin County District Court, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 152.09, subd. 1(2) (1984). The prosecution arose out of the seizure at appellant's residence, pursuant to a search warrant, of two…”
State v. McIntosh, 641 N.W.2d 3 (Minn. 2002). · cites it 3× “See Minn.Stat. § 152.09 (1980); State v. Walters, 315 N.”
State v. Reese, 446 N.W.2d 173 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 8× “FACTS On March 28, 1988, Michael Lavern Reese was charged in Albert Lea, Minnesota with possession of marijuana in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 152.09, subd. 1(2), 152.15, subd.”
State v. Moore, 431 N.W.2d 565 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 6× “02 is the statute which declares what substances are prohibited; Minn.Stat. § 152.09 describes what acts break the law; and Minn.”
In Re Welfare of C.R.M., 611 N.W.2d 802 (Minn. 2000). · cites it 4× “Florine, we held that the defendant was guilty under Minn.Stat. § 152.09, subd. 1(2) (1974), of the felony offense of unlawful possession of cocaine, but noted "to convict a defendant of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, the state must prove that defendant…”
State v. Carithers, 490 N.W.2d 620 (Minn. 1992). · cites it 6× “” Minn.Stat. § 152.09, subd. 1(1) (1986). All of these unlawful acts are applicable to transfers of controlled substances in the commercial distribution chain.”
State v. Gabbert, 411 N.W.2d 209 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 4× “Gabbert was arrested and charged with possession of a controlled substance in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 152.09, subd. 1(2); 152.15, subd.”
State v. Munoz, 385 N.W.2d 373 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4× “Appellant was convicted under Minn. Stat. § 152.09 , which states: , [I]t shall be unlawful for any person * * * to [[Image here]] (2) Possess a controlled substance, except when the possession is for his own use and is authorized by law.”
State v. Goodrich, 256 N.W.2d 506 (Minn. 1977). · cites it 2× “If any person is found guilty of a violation of section 152.09, subdivision 1, clause (2) [possession of a controlled substance] after trial or upon a plea of guilty, the court may, without entering a judgment of guilty and with the consent of such person, defer further…”
State v. Smith, 448 N.W.2d 550 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 4× “Appellant was charged at trial with possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute, Minn.Stat. § 152.09, subd. 1(1) (1988), possession of cocaine, Minn.”
State v. Marshall, 411 N.W.2d 276 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 4× “Appellant James Marshall was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to sell, Minn.Stat. § 152.09, subd.' 1(1), with reference to Minn.”
— Minn. Stat. § 152.09(1)(2) — 1 case
State v. Zimmerman, 352 N.W.2d 452 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.