Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 176. WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 176.132 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1995 c 231 art 1 s 35; art 2 s 110]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases, 1976–2019 · leading case: Mcbride v. Blacktop, 422 N.W.2d 255 (Minn. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mcbride v. Blacktop, 422 N.W.2d 255 (Minn. 1988). · cites it 96× “This appeal raises the question whether supplementary workers' compensation benefits pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 176.132, subd. 1(a) (1984) replace temporary total disability benefits when the employee has exhausted the statutory limit of 350 weeks of temporary total disability…”
Wilken v. Int'l Harvester Co., 363 N.W.2d 763 (Minn. 1985). · cites it 8× “Minn.Stat. § 176.132, subds. 2(a), (d) (1984).”
Vezina v. Best W. Inn Maplewood, 627 N.W.2d 324 (Minn. 2001). · cites it 6× “Laws 1977 , 1998 (repealing Minn. Stat. § 176.132 (1994)). The supplementary benefit was based upon the “gap” between the permanent total disability benefit and 65 percent of the statewide average weekly wage.”
Leahy v. St. Mary's Hosp., 339 N.W.2d 265 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 4× “This rate includes the supplementary benefits provided by Minn.Stat. § 176.132 (1982) because section 176.”
Sundby v. City of St. Peter, 693 N.W.2d 206 (Minn. 2005). · cites it 5× “Minn.Stat. § 176.132, subd. 3 (1994) (repealed 1995).”
Kloss v. E & H Earthmovers, 472 N.W.2d 109 (Minn. 1991). · cites it 4× “In addition to the workers’ compensation benefits, the employer/insurer who is the paying agent must pay supplementary benefits pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 176.132 (1990). The Special Compensation Fund reimburses the employer/insurer for the supplementary benefits.”
Busch v. Advanced Maint., 659 N.W.2d 772 (Minn. 2003). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 176.132 (1994) (repealed 1995).”
Kirchner v. Cnty. of Anoka, 410 N.W.2d 825 (Minn. 1987). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 176.132, subd. 2(a) (1986). III.”
Dahlbeck v. New London Concrete, 400 N.W.2d 736 (Minn. 1987). · cites it 4× “See Minn. Stat. § 176.132 , subd. 3 (1974). 1 Relator brought a personal injury action against several third parties to recover damages.”
Ruter v. Minnesota Dep't of Corr., 569 N.W.2d 407 (Minn. 1997). · cites it 4× “Notwithstanding the provisions of section 176.132, a deduction under this subdivision does not entitle an employee to supplemental benefits under section 176.”
Am. Fam. Ins. Grp. v. Udermann, 631 N.W.2d 424 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “sonal injury of July 24, 1996, for chiropractic benefits, pain clinic and pain management benefits, psychiatric or psychological benefits, health club including pool therapy, temporary total disability, temporary partial disability, permanent total disability, permanent partial…”
Sandal v. Tallman Oil Co., 281 N.W.2d 507 (Minn. 1979). “1974, § 176.132, which applied to Sandal and provided in part: “Subdivision 1.”
Show all 19 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.