Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 176.23 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1953 c 755 s 83]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1943–1994 · leading case: Senske v. Fairmont & Waseca Canning Co., 45 N.W.2d 640 (Minn. 1951).
Senske v. Fairmont & Waseca Canning Co., 45 N.W.2d 640 (Minn. 1951). “If the proceeds of a lump-sum settlement are to be depleted by devoting them to the payment of debts, such settlement is improvident and is neither fair nor reasonable within the meaning of the act; furthermore, such lump-sum settlement becomes then by indirection a device for…”
In Re Gagne v. Christians, 172 B.R. 50 (D. Minnesota 1994). “If the proceeds of a lump sum settlement are to be depleted by devoting them to the payment of debts, such settlement is improvident and is neither fair nor reasonable within the meaning of the act; furthermore, such lump sum settlement becomes then by indirection a device for…”
Fehland v. City of St. Paul, 9 N.W.2d 349 (Minn. 1943). “§ 176.23 (§ 4287). “Accrued compensation” as used in § 176.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.